Literature DB >> 10221365

Outcome assessment of minimizing vancomycin monitoring and dosing adjustments.

C M Karam1, P S McKinnon, M M Neuhauser, M J Rybak.   

Abstract

An approach to minimize monitoring of vancomycin therapy was evaluated in 120 patients, and results were compared with data from 120 patients in whom vancomycin therapy was monitored and adjusted based on serum peak and trough concentrations and traditional pharmacokinetic methods. Patients dosed by the nomogram (NM) had regimens adjusted based on actual body weight, estimated creatinine clearance, and a targeted trough concentration of 5-20 microg/ml. A single trough serum concentration was drawn only after 5 or more days of therapy. Overall, the average length of therapy was similar between groups (9.9 +/- 9.4 days NM and 8.6 +/- 7.2 days pharmacokinetic). The most common regimen for both groups was 1 g every 12 hours, although NM patients received significantly fewer grams/day (1.9 +/- 0.7 g/day) than the pharmacokinetic group (2.2 +/- 1.0 g/day, p<0.04). Patients dosed by NM also had significantly fewer regimen changes (0.63 +/- 0.96 vs pharmacokinetic 0.92 +/- 0.97, p=0.02) as well as significantly fewer serum concentrations measured/patient (1.08 +/- 1.9 vs 1.96 +/- 2.0, p=0.001). In addition, serum concentrations for NM patients were drawn later in therapy (5.4 +/- 2.5 vs 3.8 +/- 3.4 days, p=0.004). Of patients dosed by NM guidelines, 77 had trough concentrations drawn; these data were used to validate the nomogram. Seventy-two patients (94%) had trough concentrations in the target range of 5-20 microg/ml. No differences were found between groups with respect to cure, improvement, failure, or days to eradication, or with respect to nephrotoxicity. Finally, total drug cost/patient was not different between groups. A considerable cost savings to our institution was noted for patients dosed by NM compared with pharmacokinetics ($232.5 +/- 50.74 vs $403.75 +/- 70.97/mo, p=0.009) based on levels saved. Caution should be applied when generalizing our results to other patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10221365     DOI: 10.1592/phco.19.4.257.30933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  16 in total

1.  Traditional weight-based vancomycin dosing is inadequate in critically ill trauma patients.

Authors:  D D Yeh; M E Kutcher; K Lunghi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Recommendations for monitoring serum vancomycin concentrations.

Authors:  C W James; C Gurk-Turner
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2001-04

Review 3.  Approaching and analyzing a large literature on vancomycin monitoring and pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Patricia Lee; David DiPersio; Rebecca N Jerome; Arthur P Wheeler
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-10

4.  Impact of empirical-therapy selection on outcomes of intravenous drug users with infective endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Thomas P Lodise; Peggy S McKinnon; Donald P Levine; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.

Authors:  Tamar F Barlam; Sara E Cosgrove; Lilian M Abbo; Conan MacDougall; Audrey N Schuetz; Edward J Septimus; Arjun Srinivasan; Timothy H Dellit; Yngve T Falck-Ytter; Neil O Fishman; Cindy W Hamilton; Timothy C Jenkins; Pamela A Lipsett; Preeti N Malani; Larissa S May; Gregory J Moran; Melinda M Neuhauser; Jason G Newland; Christopher A Ohl; Matthew H Samore; Susan K Seo; Kavita K Trivedi
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in adult Chinese patients with post-craniotomy meningitis and its application in individualised dosage regimens.

Authors:  Wei-Wei Lin; Wei Wu; Zheng Jiao; Rong-Fang Lin; Chang-Zhen Jiang; Pin-Fang Huang; Yi-Wei Liu; Chang-Lian Wang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Prediction of failure in vancomycin-treated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: a clinically useful risk stratification tool.

Authors:  Carol L Moore; Mei Lu; Faiqa Cheema; Paola Osaki-Kiyan; Mary Beth Perri; Susan Donabedian; Nadia Z Haque; Marcus J Zervos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Prophylactic antibiotic administration for post cardiothoracic surgery sternal wounds: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Georgia Pitsiou; Ioannis Kioumis; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis; George Lazaridis; Antonis Papaiwannou; Katerina Tsirgogianni; Anastasia Karavergou; Sofia Lampaki; Aggeliki Rapti; Georgia Trakada; Athanasios Zissimopoulos; Theodoros Karaiskos; Athanasios Madesis; Georgios Drosos; Paul Zarogoulidis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-03

9.  Continuous versus intermittent infusion of vancomycin in severe Staphylococcal infections: prospective multicenter randomized study.

Authors:  M Wysocki; F Delatour; F Faurisson; A Rauss; Y Pean; B Misset; F Thomas; J F Timsit; T Similowski; H Mentec; L Mier; D Dreyfuss
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Vancomycin Dosing and Monitoring: Critical Evaluation of the Current Practice.

Authors:  Fawzy Elbarbry
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.