Literature DB >> 10220689

Thirty years of cardiac transplantation at Stanford university.

R C Robbins1, C W Barlow, P E Oyer, S A Hunt, J L Miller, B A Reitz, E B Stinson, N E Shumway.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The experience with 30 years of cardiac transplantation at Stanford University Medical Center was reviewed. A total of 954 transplants were performed in 885 patients. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on immunosuppression received: group I, no cyclosporine (INN: ciclosporin) (n = 201) (January 1968-November 1980); group II, cyclosporine (n = 248) (December 1980-June 1987); and group III, cyclosporine + OKT3 (n = 436) (July 1987-March 1998).
RESULTS: The 1-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial survivals were 68%, 41%, and 24% (group I); 80%, 57%, and 37% (group II); and 85%, 68%, and 46% (group III) (I vs II, P <.01; I vs III, P <.005; and II vs III, P <.005). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial death rates from rejection were 8%, 12%, and 14% (group I); 5%, 7%, and 7% (group II); and 2%, 5%, and 5% (group III) (I vs II, P = not significant; I vs III, P <.005; and II vs III, P <.005). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial death rates from infection were 25%, 43%, and 50% (group I); 8%, 17%, and 29% (group II); and 6%, 11%, and 16% (group III) (I vs II, P <.005; I vs III, P <.005; and II vs III, P <.05). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial death rates from graft coronary artery disease were 0%, 5%, and 13% (group I); 0%, 12%, and 19% (group II); and 1%, 6%, and 9% (group III) (I vs II, P <.01; I vs III, P <.005; and II vs III, P = not significant). There have been 69 retransplants in 67 patients with 1-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial survivals of 49%, 27%, and 15%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The evolution of 3 decades of experience with cardiac transplantation has resulted in improved overall survival. The incidence of rejection and of death from infection and graft coronary artery disease have decreased over time, primarily as a result of improvements in immunosuppression and in the prevention and treatment of infection. Continued advances in perioperative management and the development of more specific, less toxic immunosuppressive agents could further refine this initial experience and improve the survival and quality of life of patients after cardiac transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10220689     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70375-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Biomarker for diagnosis of rejection after heart transplantation].

Authors:  Matthias Frick; Herwig Antretter; Otmar Pachinger; Gerhard Pölzl
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Cardiac repair--fact or fancy?

Authors:  E Leontiadis; A Manginas; D V Cokkinos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Patients 60 years of age and older should have the same chance for heart transplantation or not?

Authors:  Mahmoud H Alshirbini; Fei Xie; Nian-Guo Dong; Si Chen; Eman Borham
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-22

Review 4.  Immunosuppressive therapy in older cardiac transplant patients.

Authors:  Arezu Zejnab Aliabadi; Andreas Oliver Zuckermann; Michael Grimm
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Two decades of cardiac transplantation at the Montreal Heart Institute.

Authors:  Frédéric Jacques; Michel Carrier; Guy B Pelletier; Michel White; Normand Racine; Michel Pellerin; Denis Bouchard; Philippe Demers; Louis P Perrault
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 6.  Where, when and how much: regulation of myelin proteolipid protein gene expression.

Authors:  P A Wight; A Dobretsova
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 7.  Surgical approaches to dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  I A Smolens; S F Bolling
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.955

8.  Medium term results following heart transplantation for end stage heart failure: A single center experience of 257 patients.

Authors:  K R Balakrishnan; K G Sureshrao; R Ravikumar; T Muralikrishna; K Ganapathy Subramaniam; R Mohan; A Ajay; K Ramasubramanian; D Jagdish; R Veena
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-09-19

9.  IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages.

Authors:  Patrick L Ergina; Jeffrey S Barkun; Peter McCulloch; Jonathan A Cook; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-06-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.