Literature DB >> 10220221

Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: a technical note.

P Bach-y-Rita1, K A Kaczmarek, M E Tyler, J Garcia-Lara.   

Abstract

Form perception with the tongue was studied with a 49-point electrotactile array. Five sighted adult human subjects (3M/2F) each received 4 blocks of 12 tactile patterns, approximations of circles, squares, and vertex-up equilateral triangles, sized to 4x4, 5x5, 6x6, and 7x7 electrode arrays. Perception with electrical stimulation of the tongue is better than with fingertip electrotactile stimulation, and the tongue requires 3% (5-15 V) of the voltage. The mean current for tongue subjects was 1.612 mA. Tongue shape recognition performance across all sizes was 79.8%. The approximate dimensions of the electrotactile array and the dimensions of compartments built into dental retainers have been determined. The goal is to develop a practical, cosmetically acceptable, wireless system for blind persons, with a miniature TV camera, microelectronics, and FM transmitter built into a pair of glasses, and the electrotactile array in a dental orthodontic retainer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10220221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  37 in total

1.  Sustained cortical and subcortical neuromodulation induced by electrical tongue stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  How a plantar pressure-based, tongue-placed tactile biofeedback modifies postural control mechanisms during quiet standing.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillerme; Nicolas Pinsault; Olivier Chenu; Matthieu Boisgontier; Jacques Demongeot; Yohan Payan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Head position-based electrotactile tongue biofeedback affects postural responses to Achilles tendon vibration in humans.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillerme; Rémy Cuisinier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Virtual active touch using randomly patterned intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Joseph E O'Doherty; Mikhail A Lebedev; Zheng Li; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Intraocular retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  M S Humayun
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

6.  Reduction of Prolonged Excessive Pressure in Seated Persons With Paraplegia Using Wireless Lingual Tactile Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  A Moreau-Gaudry; O Chenu; M V Dang; J-L Bosson; M Hommel; J Demongeot; F Cannard; B Diot; A Prince; C Hughes; N Vuillerme; Y Payan
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 7.  Cortical plasticity and preserved function in early blindness.

Authors:  Laurent Renier; Anne G De Volder; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  A wireless lingual feedback device to reduce overpressures in seated posture: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Olivier Chenu; Nicolas Vuillerme; Jacques Demongeot; Yohan Payan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue: Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation.

Authors:  Cecil A Lozano; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Marco Santello
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.111

10.  Efficacy of electrotactile vestibular substitution in patients with peripheral and central vestibular loss.

Authors:  Y P Danilov; M E Tyler; K L Skinner; R A Hogle; P Bach-y-Rita
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.