Literature DB >> 10216052

Patients' perception of visual impairment in glaucoma: a pilot study.

P Nelson1, P Aspinall, C O'Brien.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is a paucity of useful information on the level of visual disability suffered by glaucoma patients. The aims of this study were to determine and rank the frequency of self reported visual disability in daily tasks performed by glaucoma patients; to examine the interrelation between disabilities using factor analysis; to study the relation between perceived visual difficulty and a measure of the severity of visual field loss; to develop a glaucoma specific subgroup of questions; and examine the validity and reliability of this subgroup of questions.
METHODS: 63 glaucoma patients completed a questionnaire containing 62 questions covering 10 broad aspects of daily life activities using a five point answer scale. Patients were classified into three groups as having mild, moderate, and severe field loss on the basis of the perimetric results. The relation between a measure of the severity of visual field loss and subjective visual disability in the three groups was examined.
RESULTS: Using factor analysis, the most frequently reported problems were grouped into the following four categories: outdoor mobility, glare and lighting conditions and activities demanding functional peripheral vision, household tasks, and personal care. These four factors accounted for 72% of the variability in the patients' questionnaire responses. With increasing severity of binocular visual field loss there was an increase in the number of self reported visual problems. A loss of confidence in performing some routine daily tasks tended to precede self reported specific visual disabilities. The factor "glare and lighting and activities demanding functional peripheral vision" was found to have a significant relation with a measure of visual field loss and was used to create a glaucoma specific subset of questions. Cronbach's alpha showed a high degree of reliability and internal consistency (alpha =0.96) in this glaucoma specific subset of questions. Furthermore, the validity of this new subset of questions was shown to be significant (r=0.037, p<0.05) for the correlation between a measure of the severity of binocular visual field loss and the mean score of the variables used in the glaucoma specific subgroup of questions.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcome measures and quality of life issues need to be addressed in glaucoma. This pilot study identified common problems encountered by patients which at the present time are not assessed in routine glaucoma care. It also identified a subgroup of questions that seems to be specific for glaucoma. Further research is required if a significant impact on the quality of life of glaucoma patients is to be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10216052      PMCID: PMC1723044          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.83.5.546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  26 in total

Review 1.  Glaucoma therapy may take your breath away.

Authors:  P Diggory; W A Franks
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  P Gutierrez; M R Wilson; C Johnson; M Gordon; G A Cioffi; R Ritch; M Sherwood; K Meng; C M Mangione
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-06

3.  Effects of pupillary constriction on automated perimetry in normal eyes.

Authors:  K A Lindenmuth; G L Skuta; R Rabbani; D C Musch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Glaucoma's impact on quality of life and its relation to clinical indicators. A pilot study.

Authors:  M B Sherwood; A Garcia-Siekavizza; M I Meltzer; A Hebert; A F Burns; S McGorray
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Impairment and disability in the aged.

Authors:  A M Jette; L G Branch
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

6.  The association between visual impairment and mortality in elderly people.

Authors:  J R Thompson; J M Gibson; C Jagger
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Importance of pathological intraocular light scatter for visual disability.

Authors:  T J van den Berg
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01-15       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Vision in the elderly and its use in the social environment.

Authors:  L Häkkinen
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med Suppl       Date:  1984

9.  Esterman disability rating in severe glaucoma.

Authors:  R P Mills; S M Drance
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma.

Authors:  J E Ross; A J Bron; D D Clarke
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  61 in total

Review 1.  Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Vandenbroeck; S De Geest; T Zeyen; I Stalmans; F Dobbels
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Visual function and quality of life following vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peel surgery.

Authors:  S M S Ghazi-Nouri; P G Tranos; G S Rubin; Z C Adams; D G Charteris
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Quality of life and relative importance: a comparison of time trade-off and conjoint analysis methods in patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  P A Aspinall; A R Hill; B Dhillon; A M Armbrecht; P Nelson; C Lumsden; E Farini-Hudson; R Brice; A Vickers; P Buchholz
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Home lighting assessment for clients with low vision.

Authors:  Monica S Perlmutter; Anjali Bhorade; Mae Gordon; Holly Hollingsworth; Jack E Engsberg; M Carolyn Baum
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec

5.  Binocular visual field impairment in glaucoma and at-fault motor vehicle collisions.

Authors:  Gerald McGwin; Carrie Huisingh; Shelly G Jain; Christopher A Girkin; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Ying Wang; Joanne Wu; Stanley P Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Vision-specific instruments for the assessment of health-related quality of life and visual functioning: a literature review.

Authors:  Mary Kay Margolis; Karin Coyne; Tessa Kennedy-Martin; Timothy Baker; Oliver Schein; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Elevated intraocular pressure causes inner retinal dysfunction before cell loss in a mouse model of experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  Benjamin J Frankfort; A Kareem Khan; Dennis Y Tse; Inyoung Chung; Ji-Jie Pang; Zhuo Yang; Ronald L Gross; Samuel M Wu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Quality of life in patients with glaucoma who live in a developing country.

Authors:  Marcela C Cypel; Niro Kasahara; Denise Atique; Cristiano C Umbelino; Mônica P A Alcântara; Francisco S Seixas; Geraldo V de Almeida; Carmo Mandia; Ralph Cohen
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Evaluation of ocular surface disease in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Priya M Mathews; Pradeep Y Ramulu; David S Friedman; Canan A Utine; Esen K Akpek
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.