Literature DB >> 9194730

Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life.

P Gutierrez1, M R Wilson, C Johnson, M Gordon, G A Cioffi, R Ritch, M Sherwood, K Meng, C M Mangione.   

Abstract

We examined the influence of glaucomatous visual field defects on vision-targeted and generic health-related quality of life. Vision-targeted and generic health status were assessed across 5 glaucoma treatment categories and a normal reference group from 5 tertiary care ophthalmology practices during regularly scheduled eye care visits. The sample consisted of 147 patients who were members of specific glaucoma treatment categories and 44 reference group patients. For patients with glaucoma, eligibility included a diagnosis of glaucoma at least 1 year prior to enrollment and no evidence of other eye disease. Participants completed 2 vision-targeted surveys, the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire and the VF-14, and a generic health-related quality of life measure, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form. Data from automated perimetry (Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2, Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, Calif) were used to generate Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study scores for all participants. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form scores from glaucoma and reference group participants collected on a random half of the sample were similar. However, comparisons of the vision-targeted surveys demonstrated significant mean differences on 7 of 11 National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire scales, and a trend toward significant differences for the VF-14 (P < .07 by linear regression). Greater visual field defects in the better eye were significantly associated with poorer National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire scores (P < .05), as well as with worse VF-14 scores. These findings were most dramatic for patients with the most severe field loss in the better eye. Vision-targeted questionnaires were more sensitive than a generic health-related quality of life measure to differences between glaucoma and normal reference participants. Our findings indicate that self-reports of vision-targeted health-related quality of life are sensitive to visual field loss and may be useful in tandem with the clinical examination to fully understand outcomes of treatment for glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9194730     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150779014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  89 in total

Review 1.  Acquired colour vision defects in glaucoma-their detection and clinical significance.

Authors:  M Pacheco-Cutillas; D F Edgar; A Sahraie
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Relation between perceived driving disability and scores of vision screening tests.

Authors:  L J van Rijn; H Wilhelm; M Emesz; R Kaper; S Heine; S Nitsch; G Grabner; H J Völker-Dieben
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Impact of a health communication intervention to improve glaucoma treatment adherence. Results of the interactive study to increase glaucoma adherence to treatment trial.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Allen D Beck; Lucja Bundy; Susan Primo; Michael J Lynn; Julia Cleveland; Jessica A Wold; Katharina V Echt
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10

Review 4.  Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Vandenbroeck; S De Geest; T Zeyen; I Stalmans; F Dobbels
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Vision and quality-of-life.

Authors:  G C Brown
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

Review 6.  Chronic open-angle glaucoma. Review for primary care physicians.

Authors:  Feisal A Adatia; Karim F Damji
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Visual function and quality of life following vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peel surgery.

Authors:  S M S Ghazi-Nouri; P G Tranos; G S Rubin; Z C Adams; D G Charteris
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Ying Wang; Joanne Wu; Stanley P Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Vision-specific instruments for the assessment of health-related quality of life and visual functioning: a literature review.

Authors:  Mary Kay Margolis; Karin Coyne; Tessa Kennedy-Martin; Timothy Baker; Oliver Schein; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Five-year forecasts of the Visual Field Index (VFI) with binocular and monocular visual fields.

Authors:  Ryo Asaoka; Richard A Russell; Rizwan Malik; David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.