Literature DB >> 10215676

Sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus and antinociceptive effects of mu opioids: role of strain of rat, stimulus intensity, and intrinsic efficacy at the mu opioid receptor.

D Morgan1, C D Cook, M J Picker.   

Abstract

Effects of low (butorphanol, nalbuphine)-, intermediate (buprenorphine)-, and high (morphine, levorphanol)-efficacy mu opioids were examined in F344, Sprague-Dawley (SD), Long-Evans (LE), and Lewis rats using a tail withdrawal and a drug discrimination procedure. In the tail withdrawal procedure using low (50 degrees C), intermediate (52 degrees C), and high (56 degrees C) water temperatures, morphine and levorphanol produced maximal effects in each of the strains and were most potent in F344 and least potent in Lewis. Similar differences across strains were obtained with buprenorphine, and at the high intensity, maximal effects were not obtained in Lewis. At the low intensity, butorphanol produced maximal effects in F344 and SD at relatively low doses, half-maximal effects in LE at very high doses, and no effect in Lewis. Nalbuphine produced near maximal effects in F344 and SD when tested with the low intensity and no effect in the LE and Lewis. Similar results were obtained at the intermediate intensity for these opioids, although the absolute level of antinociception was lower. These results indicate that there are profound differences to the antinociceptive effects of mu opioids across rat strains. The magnitude of these differences increased with higher stimulus intensities and when tested with lower efficacy opioids. In rats trained to discriminate morphine (3.0 or 5.6 mg/kg) from water, there were no consistent differences across rat strains to the effects of these mu opioids. Possible reasons for differences between the results obtained in the tail withdrawal and drug discrimination procedures are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10215676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  19 in total

1.  Characterization of the antinociceptive effects of the individual isomers of methadone after acute and chronic administrations.

Authors:  Richard W Morgan; Katherine L Nicholson
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Effects of environmental enrichment on sensitivity to mu, kappa, and mixed-action opioids in female rats.

Authors:  Mark A Smith; Kathryn T Cole; Samantha R Gergans; Jordan C Iordanou; Megan A Lyle; Karl T Schmidt
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-04-01

3.  Fischer rats are more sensitive than Lewis rats to the suppressive effects of morphine and the aversive kappa-opioid agonist spiradoline.

Authors:  Christopher S Freet; Robert A Wheeler; Ellen Leuenberger; Nicole A S Mosblech; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 4.  Human Drug Discrimination: Elucidating the Neuropharmacology of Commonly Abused Illicit Drugs.

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Joseph L Alcorn; Anna R Reynolds; Joshua A Lile; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018

5.  Exercise reverses pain-related weight asymmetry and differentially modulates trabecular bone microarchitecture in a rat model of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jim Cormier; Katherine Cone; Janell Lanpher; Abigail Kinens; Terry Henderson; Lucy Liaw; Edward J Bilsky; Tamara King; Clifford J Rosen; Glenn W Stevenson
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.037

6.  Effects of μ-opioid receptor agonists in assays of acute pain-stimulated and pain-depressed behavior in male rats: role of μ-agonist efficacy and noxious stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Ahmad A Altarifi; Kenner C Rice; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Behavioral effects of benzylideneoxymorphone (BOM), a low efficacy µ opioid receptor agonist and a δ opioid receptor antagonist.

Authors:  Sanjana Mada; Lisa R Gerak; Amélie Soyer; David R Maguire; Zehua Hu; Vanessa Minervini; Christopher W Cunningham; Charles P France
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review.

Authors:  Ian P Stolerman; Emma Childs; Matthew M Ford; Kathleen A Grant
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

9.  Effects of morphine on thermal sensitivity in adult and aged rats.

Authors:  Drake Morgan; Jeremiah D Mitzelfelt; Lorraine M Koerper; Christy S Carter
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  The spinal antinociceptive effects of endomorphins in rats: behavioral and G protein functional studies.

Authors:  Hong Xie; James H Woods; John R Traynor; Mei-Chuan Ko
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.