Literature DB >> 10215278

Tissue proliferation within and surrounding Palmaz-Schatz stents is dependent on the aggressiveness of stent implantation technique.

R Hoffmann1, G S Mintz, R Mehran, K M Kent, A D Pichard, L F Satler, M B Leon.   

Abstract

In-stent restenosis is entirely due to intimal hyperplasia. Histologic studies have indicated that intimal hyperplasia is related to the arterial injury induced during stent implantation. We used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging to study whether tissue proliferation inside and surrounding stents is related to the aggressiveness of the implantation technique. After intervention and follow-up (mean 5.6 +/- 3.7 months), serial IVUS imaging was performed in 102 native artery stented stenoses in 91 patients. Measurements at 5 predetermined segments within each stented lesion included external elastic membrane, stent, and lumen cross-sectional areas (CSAs). Calculations included mean plaque CSA growth outside of the stent (external elastic membrane-stent) and mean neointimal hyperplasia CSA and thickness within the stent (stent-lumen). Stenoses were categorized depending on the aggressiveness of stent placement (group 1, adjunct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty pressure < 16 atm and/or balloon/artery ratio < 1.1; group 2, adjunct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty pressure > or = 16 atm and balloon/artery ratio > or = 1.1). An aggressiveness score was calculated as balloon/artery ratio x inflation pressure. Mean intimal hyperplasia CSA (2.9 +/- 1.5 vs 2.2 +/- 1.6 mm2, p = 0.028), mean intimal hyperplasia thickness (0.34 +/- 0.19 vs 0.25 +/- 0.19 mm, p = 0.012), and mean peristent tissue growth CSA (2.5 +/- 1.0 vs 1.1 +/- 1.4 mm2, p = 0.003) were significantly greater in group 2 stenoses. In addition, intimal hyperplasia CSA and thickness correlated significantly with balloon/artery ratio x inflation pressures: r = 0.305, p = 0.002 and r = 0.329, p = 0.0007, respectively, as did peristent tissue proliferation CSA (r = 0.466, p = 0.001). Tissue proliferation inside and surrounding stents may be related to aggressiveness of the stent implantation technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10215278     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00053-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Coronary stenting: why size matters.

Authors:  Edoardo De Benedetti; Philip Urban
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Spontaneous improvement of persistent ulceration after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  S Kohyama; K Kazekawa; M Iko; H Aikawa; M Tsutsumi; Y Go; S Nagata; T Kodama; K Nii; S Matsubara; A Tanaka
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  A case of active peri-stent inflammation after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Takafumi Kurosawa; Jun-Ichi Kotani; Taka-aki Matsuyama; Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Oversizing of self-expanding stents: influence on the development of neointimal hyperplasia of the carotid artery in a canine model.

Authors:  Eberhard C Kirsch; Mark S Khangure; Philip Morling; Terry J York; William McAuliffe
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Hyperexpansion of coronary stents and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandre Schaan de Quadros; Rogério Sarmento-Leite; Carlos A M Gottschall; Guilherme V Silva; Emerson C Perin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

6.  Investigating the impact of spatial priors on the performance of model-based IVUS elastography.

Authors:  M S Richards; M M Doyley
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Lesion characteristics of acute myocardial infarction: an investigation with intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  D Fukuda; T Kawarabayashi; A Tanaka; Y Nishibori; H Taguchi; Y Nishida; K Shimada; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Coronary artery stretch versus deep injury in the development of in-stent neointima.

Authors:  J Gunn; N Arnold; K H Chan; L Shepherd; D C Cumberland; D C Crossman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Comparative analysis of lumen enlargement mechanisms achieved with the bifurcation dedicated BiOSS) stent versus classical coronary stent implantations by means of provisional side branch stenting strategy: an intravascular ultrasound study.

Authors:  Robert J Gil; Jacek Bil; Aleksandra Michałek; Dobrin Vassiliev; Ricardo A Costa
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Dialysis Patients with Implanted Drug-Eluting Stents Have Lower Major Cardiac Events and Mortality than Those with Implanted Bare-Metal Stents: A Taiwanese Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hsin-Fu Lee; Lung-Sheng Wu; Yi-Hsin Chan; Cheng-Hung Lee; Jia-Rou Liu; Hui-Tzu Tu; Ming-Shien Wen; Chi-Tai Kuo; Wei-Jan Chen; Yung-Hsin Yeh; Lai-Chu See; Shang-Hung Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.