Literature DB >> 10214356

Intratumoral heterogeneity in breast carcinoma revealed by laser-microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization.

M Aubele1, A Mattis, H Zitzelsberger, A Walch, M Kremer, P Hutzler, H Höfler, M Werner.   

Abstract

To evaluate the potential cytogenetic heterogeneity in breast carcinoma, several small cell groups (each consisting of 20 to 50 cells) were investigated within paraffin sections. By laser-microdissection, three to seven cell groups were taken per case. The DNA was amplified by degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR (DOP-PCR), and the samples were analyzed by CGH for chromosomal gains and losses. Two ductal invasive breast carcinomas, one of them with two lymphnode metastases, were investigated. To compare the results from the small samples, CGH was also performed on DNA isolated from the tumorous regions of three to five serial sections (10(7) to 10(6) cells). The aberrations observed in the microdissected tumor samples were multiple and involved up to 14 different chromosomal or subchromosomal regions. The most frequent changes were gains on chromosomes 12q (14/20) and 20q (16/20), and loss on 13q (12/20). Some aberrations have rarely been detected (e.g., loss on 2p, gain on 8q). Comparing chromosomal imbalances in primary tumors and lymph node metastases, more consistent changes were found between the primary tumor and its corresponding metastases than between both primary tumors. The laser-microdissected samples in general showed more chromosomal aberrations than DNA isolated from several tumor sections. Our CGH results were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the chromosomal regions of centromere 1 and 20, and 20q13. In addition, microsatellite analyses on 31 samples confirmed our CGH findings for selected chromosome regions 2p and 11q. It can be concluded that there is a distinct intratumoral heterogeneity in primary breast tumors as well as in the corresponding lymph node metastases. The combination of microdissection and CGH enabled us to detect cytogenetic aberrations from important clones which are missed when analyzing DNA extracted from large cell numbers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10214356     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(98)00205-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet        ISSN: 0165-4608


  37 in total

1.  Tracing the tumor lineage.

Authors:  Nicholas E Navin; James Hicks
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  The Art and Applications of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Endocrine Pathology.

Authors:  George Kontogeorgos
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.943

3.  Empirical chemosensitivity testing in a spheroid model of ovarian cancer using a microfluidics-based multiplex platform.

Authors:  Tamal Das; Liliane Meunier; Laurent Barbe; Diane Provencher; Olivier Guenat; Thomas Gervais; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Leading malignant cells initiate collective epithelial cell invasion in a three-dimensional heterotypic tumor spheroid model.

Authors:  Shawn P Carey; Alina Starchenko; Alexandra L McGregor; Cynthia A Reinhart-King
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  Inferring tumor progression from genomic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Nicholas Navin; Alexander Krasnitz; Linda Rodgers; Kerry Cook; Jennifer Meth; Jude Kendall; Michael Riggs; Yvonne Eberling; Jennifer Troge; Vladimir Grubor; Dan Levy; Pär Lundin; Susanne Månér; Anders Zetterberg; James Hicks; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Single-cell genetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer reveals enormous tumor heterogeneity yet conserved genomic imbalances and gain of MYC during progression.

Authors:  Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Lissa Y Berroa Garcia; Amanda Bradley; Clarymar Ortiz-Melendez; Woei-Jyh Lee; Rebecca Christensen; Sheila A Prindiville; Kathleen A Calzone; Peter W Soballe; Yue Hu; Salim A Chowdhury; Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 7.  Laser capture microdissection and advanced molecular analysis of human breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrew P Fuller; Darryl Palmer-Toy; Mark G Erlander; Dennis C Sgroi
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  Loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in histologically normal breast epithelium is distinct from loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in co-existing carcinomas.

Authors:  Pamela S Larson; Antonio de las Morenas; Sheila R Bennett; L Adrienne Cupples; Carol L Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Estimation of tumor heterogeneity using CGH array data.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Jian Li; Shengting Li; Lars Bolund; Carsten Wiuf
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Intra-tumor heterogeneity of MLH1 promoter methylation revealed by deep single molecule bisulfite sequencing.

Authors:  Katherine E Varley; David G Mutch; Tina B Edmonston; Paul J Goodfellow; Robi D Mitra
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.