Literature DB >> 10213408

Ambulatory surgery for cleft lip repair.

T H Kim1, D M Rothkopf.   

Abstract

Standard of care for cleft lip repair has included preadmission testing, surgical correction, and postoperative hospital care. Driven not by managed care economics but to speed the safe home care of infants by parents, the authors have gained experience in ambulatory cleft lip repair. In this retrospective study the authors evaluated the outcome of patients who underwent ambulatory cleft lip repair compared with those patients who were hospitalized after surgery. From 1989 to 1998, 24 cleft lip repairs in 24 patients performed by the senior author were evaluated. Two groups were treated. Group 1 (N = 11) consisted of ambulatory unilateral cleft lip repairs and group 2 (N = 13) consisted of inpatient unilateral cleft lip repairs. Important surgical factors considered were technique of cleft lip repair, performance of ancillary procedures, type of local anesthetic administered, and intravenous steroid administration. Time to first postoperative feeding and complications, including bleeding, spontaneous or traumatic wound dehiscence, and infection, were considered important outcome parameters. There were no differences in surgical technique or use of antibiotics and postoperative analgesics between the two groups. None of the patients in group 1 underwent ancillary procedures. Four patients underwent soft palate repair and 3 patients underwent insertion of myringotomy tubes among group 2 patients. The use of a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine vs. 1% lidocaine with epinephrine as a local anesthetic and intravenous steroid administration was greater in group 1 (92%) than in group 2 (33%) patients. The average time to the first postoperative feeding was more than 1 hour sooner in the ambulatory group (p < 0.05) compared with the hospitalized group (excluding the 4 patients who underwent soft palate repair). There were no complications among patients with ambulatory cleft lip repair, and there were two cases of minor wound separation in patients who received postoperative hospital care. Although many variables factor into the outcome after cleft lip repair, these data support the safety and continued practice of ambulatory cleft lip repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10213408     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199904000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  4 in total

1.  Ambulatory cleft lip surgery: A value analysis.

Authors:  Jugpal S Arneja; Craig Mitton
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Cleft lip - a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Mahdi A Shkoukani; Michael Chen; Angela Vong
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 3.  Guidelines on pediatric day surgery of the Italian Societies of Pediatric Surgery (SICP) and Pediatric Anesthesiology (SARNePI).

Authors:  Ugo de Luca; Giovanni Mangia; Simonetta Tesoro; Ascanio Martino; Maria Sammartino; Alessandro Calisti
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.638

4.  A comparative study of immediate wound healing complications following cleft lip repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable skin sutures.

Authors:  Akeem O Alawode; Michael O Adeyemi; Olutayo James; Mobolanle O Ogunlewe; Azeez Butali; Wasiu L Adeyemo
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-08-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.