Literature DB >> 10208220

The laboratory-clinical interface: point-of-care testing.

G J Kost1, S S Ehrmeyer, B Chernow, J W Winkelman, G P Zaloga, R P Dellinger, T Shirey.   

Abstract

POC testing provides an opportunity for clinicians and laboratorians to work together to consider how best to serve the patients within an individual institution. Each health system has unique characteristics relative to patient population, as well as a unique laboratory structure. If physicians, nurses, laboratorians, and pathologists work collaboratively, the best interests of patients will be served. In some institutions that cater to specific patient groups, POC testing may offer clear and distinct advantages. In other institutions with sophisticated transport systems and established rapid response capabilities, the quality resulting from central laboratory testing may outweigh any advantages of bedside testing. Clearly, attention to regulatory issues, QC issues, the importance of proper documentation, proficiency testing, performance enhancement, and cost-effectiveness is requisite. As the technology for diagnostic testing advances through more microcomputerization, microchemistry, and enhanced test menus, the concept of POC testing will need perpetual revisiting. We hope that the information provided here will aid clinicians, laboratorians, and administrators in their quest to best serve their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10208220     DOI: 10.1378/chest.115.4.1140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  21 in total

Review 1.  Blood-on-a-chip.

Authors:  Mehmet Toner; Daniel Irimia
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Point-of-care testing: High time for a dedicated National Adverse Event Monitoring System.

Authors:  Samarina M A Musaad; Shoukat Ali Khan; Geoff Herd
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2015-02

3.  Implementation of POCT in the diabetic clinic in a large hospital.

Authors:  Donald Tanyanyiwa; Collet Dandara; Sindeep Amrat Bhana; Bruno Pauly; Florence Marule; Makhosi Ramokoka; Phillip Bwititi; Uba Nwose; Buyisiwe Nkosi
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.927

4.  Reduction in red blood cell transfusions among preterm infants: results of a randomized trial with an in-line blood gas and chemistry monitor.

Authors:  John A Widness; Ashima Madan; Ligia A Grindeanu; M Bridget Zimmerman; David K Wong; David K Stevenson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Standardization, Harmonization, and Realization.

Authors:  Nicole L Gentile; Richard F Louie; Jorge Sifontes; Daniel Mecozzi; Kristin Hale; Gerald J Kost
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2008-09-01

6.  Comparability of Results between Point-of-Care and Automated Instruments to Measure B-type Natriuretic Peptide.

Authors:  Kevin Shah; Garrett J Terracciano; Kevin Jiang; Alan S Maisel; Robert L Fitzgerald
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-02

7.  Point-of-care lactate and creatinine analysis for sick obstetric patients at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Blantyre, Malawi: A feasibility study.

Authors:  S A Glasmacher; P Bonongwe; W Stones
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.875

Review 8.  From cleanroom to desktop: emerging micro-nanofabrication technology for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Tingrui Pan; Wei Wang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Use of a blood gas analyzer and a laboratory autoanalyzer in routine practice to measure electrolytes in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Yasemin U Budak; Kagan Huysal; Murat Polat
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 10.  CMOS cell sensors for point-of-care diagnostics.

Authors:  Yekbun Adiguzel; Haluk Kulah
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.