Literature DB >> 10202720

Laser in situ keratomileusis nomogram development.

K Ditzen1, A Handzel, S Pieger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no standard laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) nomogram for the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser when used with current software versions 2.23 or 2.25. Nomogram tables developed by various EC-5000 users differ significantly from one another.
METHODS: We analyzed the results of our first 138 eyes treated for myopia and myopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser, model 2b, long working distance. In addition to analyzing standard clinical outcomes, the correction values entered into the laser were compared to the achieved change in refraction for these eyes. A global nomogram parameter was created, incorporating the effect of optical zone size and patient age. After observing initial overcorrections, we elected to treat most of the eyes using a 20% reduction of the attempted spherical correction.
RESULTS: The mean value for the attempted change in spherical equivalent refraction was -6.85 D. This correction was achieved with a standard deviation of -0.04 D at 1 month, -0.08 D at 3 months, and -0.09 D at 6 months after LASIK. The postoperative values for the uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity were similar to other published studies. However, scatterplots comparing the laser settings to achieved postoperative refractions showed a clear 20% trend toward overcorrection. This trend increased with patient age and optical zone diameter.
CONCLUSIONS: The basic calibration values (factory standard) for software versions 2.23 and 2.25 are too aggressive for LASIK treatments. When using optical zone diameters of 6 mm and above, the spherical refraction values entered into the laser must be reduced by at least 20%. LASIK nomograms for the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser should be specific for optical zone diameter and patient age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10202720     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-19990302-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  6 in total

1.  [Nomograms for the improvement of refractive outcomes].

Authors:  M Mrochen; F Hafezi; H P Iseli; J Löffler; T Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Analysis of changes in crystalline lens thickness and its refractive power after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Hai-Ke Guo; Jing Zeng; Hai-Ying Jin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Effect of Flat Cornea on Visual Outcome after LASIK.

Authors:  Engy Mohamed Mostafa
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  The effect of humidity and temperature on visual outcomes after myopic corneal laser refractive surgery.

Authors:  Christopher T Hood; Roni M Shtein; Daniel Veldheer; Munira Hussain; Leslie M Niziol; David C Musch; Shahzad I Mian
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-04

5.  Comparison of outcomes of conventional WaveLight(®) Allegretto Wave(®) and Technolas(®) excimer lasers in myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Daphne Cy Han; Jean Chen; Hla Myint Htoon; Donald Th Tan; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-24

6.  The art of nomograms.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Diego de Ortueta; Shwetabh Verma
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.