Literature DB >> 10202475

Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection.

J B Ludlow1, M Abreu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare film, desktop monitor and laptop displays of digitized film images for accuracy of caries detection.
METHODS: Sixty-four extracted teeth were mounted in eight models and radiographed with E-speed bitewing film. Films were digitized and displayed on a desktop monitor and a laptop display. Six observers scored the presence or absence of enamel and dentinal caries for each proximal surface for film, desktop and laptop displays. Results were compared with the histology of ground sections. ROC curve areas for each display mode and observer were assessed for significant differences with ANOVA.
RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy for proximal surface caries detection was not significantly different for conventional film or desktop monitor and laptop displays for detection of enamel caries (P = 0.9112) or dentin caries (P = 0.2796).
CONCLUSIONS: Current laptop active matrix liquid crystal displays provide diagnostic quality for caries detection comparable with conventional film and desktop monitor displays.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10202475     DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  10 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of film-based, TIFF, and wavelet compressed digital temporomandibular joint images.

Authors:  C J Trapnell; W C Scarfe; J H Cook; A M Silvejra; F J Regennitter; B S Haskell
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media.

Authors:  Frieda Gijbels; Gerard Sanderink; Herman Pauwels; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries.

Authors:  A A Pontual; D P de Melo; S M de Almeida; F N Bóscolo; F Haiter Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Evaluation of proximal caries in images resulting from different modes of radiographic digitalization.

Authors:  C R G Xavier; Ana Claudia Araujo-Pires; M L Poleti; I R F Rubira-Bullen; O Ferreira; A L A Capelozza
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.

Authors:  Soili Kallio-Pulkkinen; Sisko Huumonen; Marianne Haapea; Esa Liukkonen; Annina Sipola; Osmo Tervonen; Miika T Nieminen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  LCD and CRT display of storage phosphor plate and limited cone beam computed tomography images for the evaluation of root canal fillings.

Authors:  B Güniz Baksi; Elif Soğur; Hans-Göran Gröndahl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparison of grayscale and color-scale renderings of digital medical images for diagnostic interpretation.

Authors:  Akio Ogura; Aoi Kamakura; Youhei Kaneko; Tomoya Kitaoka; Norio Hayashi; Anna Taniguchi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-03-27

8.  A Subjective Assessment of Perceived Clarity of Indirect Digital Images and Processed Digital Images with Conventional Intra-oral Periapical Radiographs.

Authors:  Suchetha N Malleshi; Mahima V G; Anudeepa Raina; Karthikeya Patil
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

9.  Digital radiography with computerized conventional monitors compared to medical monitors in vertical root fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  Maryam Tofangchiha; Mamak Adel; Mahin Bakhshi; Mahsa Esfehani; Pantea Nazeman; Mojgan Ghorbani Elizeyi; Amir Javadi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-01-20

10.  Image quality evaluation of eight complementary metal-oxide semiconductor intraoral digital X-ray sensors.

Authors:  Sorin Teich; Wisam Al-Rawi; Masahiro Heima; Fady F Faddoul; Gil Goldzweig; Zvi Gutmacher; Dror Aizenbud
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.607

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.