Literature DB >> 10202102

Phylogenetic influence on mating call preferences in female túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.

.   

Abstract

We evaluated how various phylogenetic models for estimating ancestral characters can influence studies of behavioural evolution. Previously we used a single model of evolution to estimate the values of call characters at ancestral nodes for the Physalaemus pustulosus species group and some close relatives (Ryan & Rand 1995, Science, 269, 390-392). We then synthesized these ancestral calls and measured the females' responses to such calls in phonotaxis experiments. We repeated the above procedure to determine the sensitivity of these results and conclusions to various models used to estimate the ancestral call characters. We asked whether: (1) different models gave different call estimates for the same nodes; (2) different call estimates at the same node were perceived as different by females; and (3) differences in female responses influenced previous conclusions. We used seven different models that varied in at least one of the following parameters: tree topology (bifurcating versus pectinate in-group trees), algorithms (local squared-change versus squared-change parsimony), tempo (gradual or punctuated evolution), and outgroups (two or three outgroup taxa used). Although different models often gave different call estimates for the same node, these different estimates often were not perceived as different by the females. These data reinforce our previous conclusions that: (1) the range of female preferences exceeds the known variation of the conspecific call; (2) females do not discriminate between the conspecific call and the call of their most recent ancestor; and (3) female responses may be context dependent, given that females differ in their responses to the same signal variation in discrimination and recognition experiments. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10202102     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  6 in total

1.  Vestigial preference functions in neural networks and túngara frogs.

Authors:  S M Phelps; M J Ryan; A S Rand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs.

Authors:  Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  History influences signal recognition: neural network models of túngara frogs.

Authors:  S M Phelps; M J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.

Authors:  Ximena E Bernal; A Stanley Rand; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Neural activity patterns in response to interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating calls in the túngara frog.

Authors:  Mukta Chakraborty; Lisa A Mangiamele; Sabrina S Burmeister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  ZENK activation in the nidopallium of black-capped chickadees in response to both conspecific and heterospecific calls.

Authors:  Marc T Avey; Laurie L Bloomfield; Julie E Elie; Todd M Freeberg; Lauren M Guillette; Marisa Hoeschele; Homan Lee; Michele K Moscicki; Jessica L Owens; Christopher B Sturdy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.