Literature DB >> 10202094

Female responses to isolated signals from multimodal male courtship displays in the wolf spider genus Schizocosa (Araneae: Lycosidae).

.   

Abstract

Male wolf spiders within the genus Schizocosa display considerable variation in foreleg ornamentation as well as in courtship communication. Multiple modes of male signalling have evolved in a number of species. Divergence in courtship signals among species within this genus may be directly associated with variation in the sensory sensitivities of conspecific females. We isolated the visual and vibratory courtship cues of four species of Schizocosa and recorded conspecific female receptivity to each isolated cue. We also examined female receptivity to complete multimodal courtship signals. We found that the sensory sensitivities of conspecific females were associated with the predominant modes of male courtship communication. Species in which females use mostly stridulatory cues in assessing conspecific males tended to have stridulation-based male courtship displays (S. duplex and S. uetzi) while the opposite was true for species in which females used more visual cues in male assessment (S. stridulans and S. crassipes). This study suggests coevolution between male signal design and female sensory design. We discuss possible scenarios that could be driving this coevolution, including hypotheses of sensory bias and environmental constraints. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10202094     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  16 in total

1.  Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype.

Authors:  Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A cis-regulatory sequence within the yellow locus of Drosophila melanogaster required for normal male mating success.

Authors:  Mark David Drapeau; Shawn A Cyran; Michaela M Viering; Pamela K Geyer; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Multiple signals and male spacing affect female preference at cocktail parties in treefrogs.

Authors:  Christina Richardson; Thierry Lengagne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Seismic signal dominance in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1991.

Authors:  Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 5.  How do animals use substrate-borne vibrations as an information source?

Authors:  Peggy S M Hill
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-07-11

6.  Visual motion detection and habitat preference in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  David S Steinberg; Manuel Leal
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Jumping spiders: An exceptional group for comparative cognition studies.

Authors:  Samuel Aguilar-Arguello; Ximena J Nelson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Signaling in multiple modalities in male rhesus macaques: sex skin coloration and barks in relation to androgen levels, social status, and mating behavior.

Authors:  James P Higham; Dana Pfefferle; Michael Heistermann; Dario Maestripieri; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) wing-whistles may contain threat-related information for con- and hetero-specifics.

Authors:  Seth W Coleman
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-06-13

10.  Multimodal communication in a noisy environment: a case study of the Bornean rock frog Staurois parvus.

Authors:  T Ulmar Grafe; Doris Preininger; Marc Sztatecsny; Rosli Kasah; J Maximilian Dehling; Sebastian Proksch; Walter Hödl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.