Literature DB >> 10202063

Does cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent the recurrence of biliary complications?

K H Lai1, L F Lin, G H Lo, J S Cheng, R L Huang, C K Lin, J S Huang, P I Hsu, N J Peng, L P Ger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The intact gallbladder after endoscopic sphincterotomy is thought to be a potential risk factor for recurrent biliary complications. The aim of this non-randomized prospective study was to investigate whether cholecystectomy soon after endoscopic sphincterotomy could prevent the recurrence of biliary complications.
METHODS: From January 1991 to October 1995, 140 patients with intact gallbladder underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy for clearance of stones in the bile duct. Of the 140 patients, 46 underwent elective cholecystectomy soon after sphincterotomy (group A) and 94 did not (group B). All 140 patients had quantitative cholescintigraphy after normalization of liver function and were followed on a regular basis with liver biochemistry, sonography, and/or computed tomography. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was also performed if a recurrent biliary problem was suspected.
RESULTS: After a median 43 months (range 23 to 80) of follow-up, 5 patients in group A developed bile duct stones whereas 12 patients in group B had recurrent stones; 4 patients in group A versus 6 patients in group B had recurrent biliary symptoms. One patient in group A and 5 patients in group B with recurrent biliary stones were without symptoms. In group B, the age, gender, diameter of the bile duct, preexisting cholelithiasis, abnormal filling of the gallbladder on quantitative cholescintigraphy, and presence of juxtapapillary diverticulum were not found to be the significant factors affecting the recurrence of biliary symptoms or stones. Endoscopic removal of recurrent biliary stones was successful in all patients. Three patients in group B underwent cholecystectomy after abatement of symptoms.
CONCLUSION: Elective cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy does not reduce the incidence of recurrent biliary complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10202063     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70047-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  21 in total

1.  Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk?

Authors:  R Costi; D DiMauro; A Mazzeo; A S Boselli; S Contini; V Violi; L Roncoroni; L Sarli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?

Authors:  A de Vries; S C Donkervoort; A A W van Geloven; E G J M Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Expectant treatment or cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis in patients over 80 years old?

Authors:  C M Pring; L Skelding-Millar; R J R Goodall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Gallstone pancreatitis--who really needs an ERCP?

Authors:  M F Byrne
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Risk factors of acute cholecystitis after endoscopic common bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Jun Kyu Lee; Ji Kon Ryu; Joo Kyung Park; Won Jae Yoon; Sang Hyub Lee; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Yong-Tae Kim; Yong Bum Yoon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  The fate of patients who undergo "preoperative" ERCP to clear known or suspected bile duct stones.

Authors:  M F Byrne; M T McLoughlin; R M Mitchell; H Gerke; T N Pappas; M S Branch; P S Jowell; J Baillie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: a propensity score-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Shinpei Doi; Ichiro Yasuda; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Takuji Iwashita; Shinya Uemura; Takahiro Yamauchi; Masanori Nakashima; Seiji Adachi; Masahito Shimizu; Eiichi Tomita; Takao Itoi; Hisataka Moriwaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Long-term follow-up study of gallbladder in situ after endoscopic common duct stone removal in Korean patients.

Authors:  Mei Lan Cui; Joon Hyun Cho; Tae Nyeun Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy.

Authors:  T Ando; T Tsuyuguchi; T Okugawa; M Saito; T Ishihara; T Yamaguchi; H Saisho
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  The Impact of Gallbladder Status on Biliary Complications After the Endoscopic Removal of Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Myung Hi Kim; Seong Jae Yeo; Min Kyu Jung; Chang Min Cho
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.