Literature DB >> 10201459

Omeprazole versus high-dose ranitidine in mild gastroesophageal reflux disease: short- and long-term treatment. The Dutch Reflux Study Group.

H P Festen1, E Schenk, G Tan, P Snel, F Nelis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with reflux esophagitis suffer from a chronic condition that may cause considerable discomfort because of recurrent symptoms and diminished quality of life. This study was designed to evaluate acute and long-term treatment comparing standard doses of omeprazole and high-dose ranitidine.
METHODS: Patients with endoscopically verified symptomatic esophagitis grade I or II were initially treated with omeprazole 20 mg daily or ranitidine 300 mg twice daily for 4-8 wk. Patients who were symptom free were randomized to maintenance treatment with omeprazole 10 mg daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. Patients were seen every 3 months or at symptomatic relapse.
RESULTS: The percentage of asymptomatic patients after 4 and 8 wk treatment were 61% and 74%, respectively, for omeprazole and 31% and 50%, respectively, for ranitidine. Of 446 patients treated initially, 277 were asymptomatic, of whom 263 entered the maintenance study. The estimated proportion of patients in remission after 12 months of maintenance treatment with omeprazole 10 mg daily (n = 134) and ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (n = 129) were 68% and 39%, respectively (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole 20 mg daily is superior to high-dose ranitidine in the symptomatic treatment of reflux esophagitis grade I and II. Furthermore, omeprazole at half the standard dose is more effective than ranitidine in a standard dose in keeping patients in remission for a period of 12 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10201459     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.989_l.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  7 in total

1.  Maintenance therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Akihito Nagahara; Mariko Hojo; Daisuke Asaoka; Sumio Watanabe
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-19

2.  A randomised controlled trial of four management strategies for dyspepsia: relationships between symptom subgroups and strategy outcome.

Authors:  N T Lewin van den Broek; M E Numans; E Buskens; T J Verheij; N J de Wit; A J Smout
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Symptom and health-related quality-of-life measures for use in selected gastrointestinal disease studies: a review and synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  A M Rentz; C Battista; E Trudeau; R Jones; P Robinson; S Sloan; S Mathur; L Frank; D A Revicki
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  A systematic review of symptomatic outcomes used in oesophagitis drug therapy trials.

Authors:  N Sharma; C Donnellan; C Preston; B Delaney; G Duckett; P Moayyedi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  A comparison of the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication) in the treatment of GORD.

Authors:  Laura Bojke; Edward Hornby; Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Lansoprazole for long-term maintenance therapy of erosive esophagitis: double-blind comparison with ranitidine.

Authors:  David A Peura; James W Freston; Marian M Haber; Thomas O Kovacs; Barbara Hunt; Stuart Atkinson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Improving health-related quality of life in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Michael J Shaw; Joseph A Crawley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.