Literature DB >> 17887805

A comparison of the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication) in the treatment of GORD.

Laura Bojke1, Edward Hornby, Mark Sculpher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) causes some of the most frequently seen symptoms in both primary and secondary care. An estimated 4-5 patients (age range 18-60 years) per 10,000 (0.045% of the general population) are receiving maintenance proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for oesophagitis and reflux. The treatment of reflux disease represents significant prescription drug costs to the UK NHS. An alternative to lifelong pharmacotherapy is surgical treatment of reflux using the laparoscopic fundoplication technique to effect a cure. A multicentre study (REFLUX trial) comparing laparoscopic fundoplication with medical management (PPIs) among patients with GORD is currently underway in the UK. This study includes data collection to contribute to a cost-effectiveness analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To generate some preliminary estimates of the cost effectiveness of surgical and medical management of GORD to guide UK NHS decision making before the REFLUX trial reports.
METHODS: A Markov model was developed in Excel. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was employed to assess the uncertainty associated with the point estimates. Two strategies were compared: long-term medical management or immediate laparoscopic surgery for GORD. Health outcomes were expressed in terms of QALYs with a lifetime time horizon (30 years) for a patient aged 45 years at commencement of treatment. Costs (pound, 2004 values) of drugs and costs associated with surgery were obtained from five of the REFLUX study centres. Costs and outcomes were discounted by 3.5% per anum. Value of information analysis was used to quantify the cost of uncertainty associated with the decision about which therapy to adopt, indicating the maximum value of future research.
RESULTS: Treatment with laparoscopic fundoplication is the most costly strategy but is also associated with more QALYs. The incremental cost per additional QALY for surgery versus medical management was 180 pounds. However, the cost effectiveness of surgery was uncertain, and the probability that it is cost effective at the threshold of 30,000 pounds per QALY was 0.639. Value of information analysis suggests that further research in this area could be potentially worthwhile. Specifically, this research should focus on the health-related quality of life of patients on medical management or post-surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the model suggest that, on the basis of current evidence, laparoscopic fundoplication represents a cost effective means of treating GORD rather than lifelong medical management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17887805     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  51 in total

1.  Laparoscopic antireflux surgery at an outpatient surgery center.

Authors:  C R Finley; J B McKernan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE).

Authors:  Karl Claxton; Mark Sculpher; Michael Drummond
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-08-31       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Success of laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  R J Landreneau; R J Wiechmann; S R Hazelrigg; T S Santucci; T M Boley; M J Magee; K S Naunheim
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A S Detsky; I G Naglie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Continued (5-year) followup of a randomized clinical study comparing antireflux surgery and omeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  L Lundell; P Miettinen; H E Myrvold; S A Pedersen; B Liedman; J G Hatlebakk; R Julkonen; K Levander; J Carlsson; M Lamm; I Wiklund
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Lifetime costs of surgical versus medical treatment of severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Finland.

Authors:  M Viljakka; J Nevalainen; J Isolauri
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Five-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic total versus anterior 180 degrees fundoplication.

Authors:  R Ludemann; D I Watson; G G Jamieson; P A Game; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  Overview: initial and long-term management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J Dent; N J Talley
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Medical or surgical therapy for erosive reflux esophagitis: cost-utility analysis using a Markov model.

Authors:  Joseph Romagnuolo; Michael A Meier; Daniel C Sadowski
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A comparison of five maintenance therapies for reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  S Vigneri; R Termini; G Leandro; S Badalamenti; M Pantalena; V Savarino; F Di Mario; G Battaglia; G S Mela; A Pilotto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

1.  Weighing the option of surgical therapy in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2008-04

Review 2.  A systematic and critical review of the evolving methods and applications of value of information in academia and practice.

Authors:  Lotte Steuten; Gijs van de Wetering; Karin Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Valesca Retèl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Anthony S Thijssen; Ivo A M J Broeders; G Ardine de Wit; Werner A Draaisma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sophia K McKinley; Rebecca C Dirks; Danielle Walsh; Celeste Hollands; Lauren E Arthur; Noe Rodriguez; Joyce Jhang; Ahmed Abou-Setta; Aurora Pryor; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Bethany J Slater
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Economic evaluations of gastroesophageal reflux disease medical management.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Dustin D French; John E Pandolfino; Colin W Howden
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Treatment Pattern and Economic Burden of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients in Korea.

Authors:  Susan Park; Jin-Won Kwon; Joong-Min Park; Sungsoo Park; Kyung Won Seo
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

7.  Laparoscopic fundoplication compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: cost effectiveness study.

Authors:  David Epstein; Laura Bojke; Mark J Sculpher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-14

8.  The characteristics of antireflux surgery compared to proton pump inhibitor treatment in Korea: a nationwide study using claim data from 2007 to 2016.

Authors:  Susan Park; Jin-Won Kwon; Joong-Min Park; Sungsoo Park; Jinseub Hwang; Kyung Won Seo
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 1.859

9.  Anti-reflux Surgery Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Study in Korea.

Authors:  Susan Park; Sungsoo Park; Joong-Min Park; Soorack Ryu; Jinseub Hwang; Jin-Won Kwon; Kyung Won Seo
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.