Literature DB >> 10199227

Virological response to protease inhibitor therapy in an HIV clinic cohort.

S Staszewski1, V Miller, C Sabin, A Carlebach, A M Berger, E Weidmann, E B Helm, A Hill, A Phillips.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: New antiretroviral strategies aim to reduce plasma HIV RNA (viral load) to below the limits of detectability of assays with the objective of reducing viral replication in order to stop or reverse the pathogenic process and prevent development of drug resistance. First use of a protease inhibitor might offer the most realistic chance of achieving this aim. Our objective was to study the virological response to protease inhibitors in patients taking them for the first time.
METHODS: A total of 901 patients from a large outpatient clinic were followed a mean of 15 months from the time of starting a protease inhibitor until 1 May 1998. Viral load and CD4 cell count measurements were made on average every 34 days.
RESULTS: Overall there was a 79% [95% confidence interval (CI), 76-82] probability of the patients achieving a viral load < 500 copies/ml by 24 weeks after starting the protease inhibitor. In a multiple Cox regression model, those with lower initial viral load [relative hazard (RH), 0.72; P < 0.0001], higher CD4 cell count (RH, 1.07; P = 0.002), those starting other new drugs at same time as the protease inhibitor (RH, 1.46 for two versus none; P = 0.003), those who were antiretroviral-naive, and those using indinavir or nelfinavir were more likely to achieve such levels. In those 651 patients achieving viral load < 500 copies/ml within 24 weeks, there was an estimated 53% (95% CI, 51-55) probability of rebound of viral load to > 500 copies/ml by 52 weeks from the first undetectable value. Again, those who had started other new drugs at the same time as the protease inhibitor (RH, 0.57; P = 0.003 for starting two versus none) tended to experience a lower probability of viral load rebound, as did those with higher initial CD4 cell count (RH, 0.87 per 100 x 10(6)/l higher; P = 0.0007). Those who took saquinavir achieved less durable virological responses than those who took other protease inhibitors.
CONCLUSIONS: Starting protease inhibitor therapy with two other new antiretroviral drugs simultaneously with protease inhibitor therapy offers a better best chance of achieving sustained viral load < 500 copies/ml than starting fewer new drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10199227     DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199902250-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS        ISSN: 0269-9370            Impact factor:   4.177


  12 in total

1.  Benchmarks for antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  O J Cohen; A S Fauci
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Viral evolution in response to the broad-based retroviral protease inhibitor TL-3.

Authors:  B Bühler; Y C Lin; G Morris; A J Olson; C H Wong; D D Richman; J H Elder; B E Torbett
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in treatment of HIV infection.

Authors:  D J Back; S H Khoo; S E Gibbons; C Merry
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Has there been a turning point in the numbers of AIDS and HIV antibody positive cases in Ireland?

Authors:  G E Kelly; S M Clarke
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Nelfinavir: an update on its use in HIV infection.

Authors:  A Bardsley-Elliot; G L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Pharmacokinetics of indinavir and ritonavir administered at 667 and 100 milligrams, respectively, every 12 hours compared with indinavir administered at 800 milligrams every 8 hours in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

Authors:  Frank S Rhame; Sandy L Rawlins; Richard A Petruschke; Tara A Erb; Gregory A Winchell; Helene M Wilson; Jonathan M Edelman; Murray A Abramson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Adherence to antiretroviral therapy and its impact on clinical outcome in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  N M Ferguson; C A Donnelly; J Hooper; A C Ghani; C Fraser; L M Bartley; R A Rode; P Vernazza; D Lapins; S L Mayer; R M Anderson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Clinical, immunological and virological evolution in patients with CD4 T-cell count above 500/mm3: is there a benefit to treat with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)?

Authors:  Lionel Piroth; Christine Binquet; Marielle Buisson; Evelyne Kohli; Michel Duong; Michèle Grappin; Michal Abrahamowicz; Catherine Quantin; Henri Portier; Pascal Chavanet
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 9.  Molecular mechanisms of FIV infection.

Authors:  John H Elder; Magnus Sundstrom; Sohela de Rozieres; Aymeric de Parseval; Chris K Grant; Ying-Chuan Lin
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 2.046

10.  R57K polymorphism in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease as predictor of early virological failure in a cohort of antiretroviral-naive patients treated mostly with a nelfinavir-containing regimen.

Authors:  Bernard Masquelier; Cecile Droz; Martin Dary; Christian Perronne; Virginie Ferré; Bruno Spire; Diane Descamps; François Raffi; Françoise Brun-Vézinet; Geneviève Chêne
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.