Literature DB >> 15504842

Pharmacokinetics of indinavir and ritonavir administered at 667 and 100 milligrams, respectively, every 12 hours compared with indinavir administered at 800 milligrams every 8 hours in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

Frank S Rhame1, Sandy L Rawlins, Richard A Petruschke, Tara A Erb, Gregory A Winchell, Helene M Wilson, Jonathan M Edelman, Murray A Abramson.   

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients on nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors with HIV RNA at <1,000 copies/ml were randomized in an open-label study to administration of combined indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/RTV) at 667/100 mg every 12 h (q12h) or IDV alone at 800 mg q8h to determine the regimens' pharmacokinetics. On day 14, plasma IDV and RTV levels were determined over 24 h. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics (minimum concentration of drug in serum [C(min)], area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC(0-24)], and maximum concentration of drug in serum [C(max)]) were expressed as geometric mean values with 90% confidence intervals (CI). The primary hypothesis was that the lower bound of the protocol-specified 90% CI for the geometric mean C(min) ratio of the combination compared to IDV alone regimen would be >/=2. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, and 24 (15 male; average age, 42 years) completed the study. The C(min), AUC(0-24), and C(max) for IDV/RTV compared to IDV alone were 1,511 versus 250 nM, 119,557 versus 77,034 nM . h, and 10,428 versus 10,407 nM, respectively. Corresponding relationships for IDV/RTV compared to IDV alone were a 6.0-fold increase in C(min) (90% CI, 4.0, 9.3), an increase in AUC(0-24) (1.5-fold, 90% CI, 1.2, 2.0), and no increase in C(max). Adverse events were similar and generally mild, with no cases of nephrolithiasis. The geometric mean ratio of IDV C(min) for IDV/RTV compared to IDV was at least 2 by a lower bound of the 90% CI, satisfying the primary hypothesis. The C(max) was not increased, suggesting an IDV/RTV 667/100-mg toxicity profile may be similar to that of unboosted IDV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15504842      PMCID: PMC525412          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4200-4208.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  26 in total

Review 1.  Low-dose ritonavir for protease inhibitor pharmacokinetic enhancement.

Authors:  R Chris Rathbun; Deanna R Rossi
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic enhancement of protease inhibitors.

Authors:  E P Acosta
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  Open-label study of a twice-daily indinavir 800-mg/ritonavir 100-mg regimen in protease inhibitor-naive HIV-infected adults.

Authors:  Benjamin Young; Margaret A Fischl; Helene M Wilson; Tyler S Finn; Erin H Jensen; Mark J DiNubile; Robert K Zeldin
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 4.  Role of therapeutic drug monitoring for protease inhibitors.

Authors:  L John; F Marra; M H Ensom
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 5.  Principles and practice of HIV-protease inhibitor pharmacoenhancement.

Authors:  G J Moyle; D Back
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.180

6.  [Indinavir-ritonavir combination: pharmacologic results and tolerance in patients infected by HIV].

Authors:  F Bani-Sadr; P Perré; G Peytavin; L Bernard; J C Melchior; C Perronne; P de Truchis
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2001-04-21       Impact factor: 1.228

7.  Continued indinavir versus switching to indinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected patients with suppressed viral load.

Authors:  Juan A Arnaiz; Josep Mallolas; Daniel Podzamczer; Jan Gerstoft; Jens D Lundgren; Pedro Cahn; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Antonella D'Arminio-Monforte; Arnaldo Casiró; Peter Reiss; David M Burger; Michael Stek; José M Gatell
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 4.177

8.  Long-term efficacy and safety of ritonavir/indinavir at 400/400 mg twice a day in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as first line antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  M Lichterfeld; H D Nischalke; F Bergmann; W Wiesel; A Rieke; A Theisen; G Fätkenheuer; M Oette; H Carls; S Fenske; M Nadler; H Knechten; J-C Wasmuth; J K Rockstroh
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.180

9.  Efficacy of a twice-daily antiretroviral regimen containing 100 mg ritonavir/400 mg indinavir in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  Jade Ghosn; Claire Lamotte; Hocine Ait-Mohand; Marc Wirden; Rachid Agher; Luminita Schneider; François Bricaire; Claudine Duvivier; Vincent Calvez; Gilles Peytavin; Christine Katlama
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 10.  A critical evaluation of the therapeutic range of indinavir.

Authors:  Craig R Rayner; Kirsten J Galbraith; Jennifer L Marriott; Gregory J Duncan
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  2 in total

1.  Development of a macrophage-based nanoparticle platform for antiretroviral drug delivery.

Authors:  Huanyu Dou; Christopher J Destache; Justin R Morehead; R Lee Mosley; Michael D Boska; Jeffrey Kingsley; Santhi Gorantla; Larisa Poluektova; Jay A Nelson; Mahesh Chaubal; Jane Werling; James Kipp; Barrett E Rabinow; Howard E Gendelman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Fosamprenavir : clinical pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of the amprenavir prodrug.

Authors:  Mary Beth Wire; Mark J Shelton; Scott Studenberg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.