Literature DB >> 10198721

Major organ function under mechanical support: comparative studies of pulsatile and nonpulsatile circulation.

A Sezai1, M Shiono, Y Orime, K Nakata, M Hata, M Iida, S Kashiwazaki, J Kinoshita, M Nemoto, T Koujima, M Furuichi, K Eda, H Hirose, T Yoshino, A Saitoh, Y Taniguchi, Y Sezai.   

Abstract

We examined a major organ function during 3 h biventricular assisted circulation after acute myocardial infarction model in the pig. In left ventricular circulation, the outflow cannula was placed in the ascending aorta and an inflow cannula through the mitral valve in the left ventricle. A pump (pulsatile group, Zeon Medical, Inc., Tokyo, Japan and nonpulsatile group, Nikkiso HPM-15, Nikkiso, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was connected to each cannula. In right ventricular circulation, the outflow cannula was placed in the pulmonary artery and an inflow cannula in the right ventricle. The right ventricular circulation was supported by a nonpulsatile pump (Nikkiso HPM-15). The items measured were the regional blood flows of the cortex and medulla in the kidney, white matter and gray mater in brain, and liver; renal arterial flow; carotid arterial flow; portal vein flow; common hepatic arterial flow; arterial ketone body ratio (AKBR); and lactate/pyrubic acid (L/P). In the pulsatile group, the renal cortical blood flow increased, and the medulla blood flow decreased. On the other hand, in the nonpulsatile group, both regional blood flows decreased. That means that in the pulsatile assisted group intrarenal redistribution improved rather than in the nonpulsatile assisted group. In addition the liver regional blood flow, AKBR, and L/P showed significant differences between the pulsatile and nonpulsatile groups. On the other hand, the white matter and gray matter regional blood flows and carotid arterial flow did not show significant differences between the groups. The results of our study indicated that pulsatile circulation produced superior circulation in the kidney and liver, and microcirculation on the cell level was superior as well in early treatment of acute heart failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10198721     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06318.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  7 in total

1.  Computational modelling and evaluation of cardiovascular response under pulsatile impeller pump support.

Authors:  Yubing Shi; Alistair G Brown; Patricia V Lawford; Andreas Arndt; Peter Nuesser; D Rodney Hose
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Deborah J Kozik; Mark D Plunkett
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Short-term mechanical circulatory support as bridge to heart transplantation: paracorporeal ventricular assist device as alternative to extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Sandro Sponga; Giovanni Benedetti; Ugolino Livi
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

4.  Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices: is there an advantage to pulsatility?

Authors:  Allen Cheng; Christine A Williamitis; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-11

5.  Durability improvement of polymer chamber of pulsatile extracorporeal life support system in terms of mechanical change.

Authors:  Hyuk Choi; Seung Hoon Paik; Kwang Ho Lee; Byoung Goo Min; Yong Soon Won
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 6.  Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge.

Authors:  Davor Barić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.351

7.  Comparison of Hemodynamic Energy between Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene and Dacron Artificial Vessels.

Authors:  Jaekwan Lim; Jong Yun Won; Chi Bum Ahn; Jieon Kim; Hee Jung Kim; Jae Seung Jung
Journal:  J Chest Surg       Date:  2021-04-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.