Literature DB >> 10198135

Saccadic performance as a function of the presence and disappearance of auditory and visual fixation stimuli.

T L Taylor1, R M Klein, D P Munoz.   

Abstract

Relative to when a fixated stimulus remains visible, saccadic latencies are facilitated when a fixated stimulus is extinguished simultaneously with or prior to the appearance of an eccentric auditory, visual, or combined visual-auditory target. In a study of nine human subjects, we determined whether such facilitation (the "gap effect") occurs equivalently for the disappearance of fixated auditory stimuli and fixated visual stimuli. In the present study, a fixated auditory (noise) stimulus remained present (overlap) or else was extinguished simultaneously with (step) or 200 msec prior to (gap) the appearance of a visual, auditory (tone), or combined visual-auditory target 10 degrees to the left or right of fixation. The results demonstrated equivalent facilitatory effects due to the disappearance of fixated auditory and visual stimuli and are consistent with the presumed role of the superior colliculus in the gap effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10198135     DOI: 10.1162/089892999563337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Fixation offset and stop signal intensity effects on saccadic countermanding: a crossmodal investigation.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effect of stimuli that isolate S-cones on early saccades and the gap effect.

Authors:  A J Anderson; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Non-lateralized auditory input enhances averaged vectors in the oculomotor system.

Authors:  N Van der Stoep; T C W Nijboer; S Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Auditory Attentional Disengagement in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Brandon Keehn; Girija Kadlaskar; Rebecca McNally Keehn; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-10

5.  Behavioral studies of auditory-visual spatial recognition and integration in rats.

Authors:  Shuzo Sakata; Tetsuo Yamamori; Yoshio Sakurai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  When pros become cons for anti- versus prosaccades: factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Myriam W G Vandenbroucke; Jon Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Bimodal interactions in the superior colliculus of the behaving cat.

Authors:  Luis C Populin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Anesthetics change the excitation/inhibition balance that governs sensory processing in the cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  Luis C Populin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Pro- and antisaccades in children elicited by visual and acoustic targets - does modality matter?

Authors:  Johanna Goepel; Stefanie C Biehl; Johanna Kissler; Isabella Paul-Jordanov
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Differences in MEG gamma oscillatory power during performance of a prosaccade task in adolescents with FASD.

Authors:  Julia M Stephen; Brian A Coffman; David B Stone; Piyadasa Kodituwakku
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.