OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy reduces the likelihood of biochemical progression at 36 months. METHODS:Two hundred thirteen patients with localized prostate cancer were randomized to radical prostatectomy alone (Sx, n = 101) or a 12-week course of 300 mg of cyproterone acetate daily followed by surgery (CPA, n = 112). Biochemical progression (two consecutive detectable prostate-specific antigen [PSA] values) was determined for the entire group and by baseline PSA, Gleason score, clinical stage, and pathologic stage. RESULTS: The probability of biochemical progression at 36 months was similar in both groups (CPA 40.2%, Sx 30.1%; P = 0.3233). CPA patients with baseline serum PSA between 25 and 50 ng/mL had a lower probability of biochemical progression (CPA 63.5%, Sx 84.6%; P = 0.0038). No difference in the probability of biochemical progression was seen between groups when analyzed by clinical stage or Gleason score. When analyzed by pathologic margin status, no difference was observed in the probability of biochemical progression in patients with organ-confined disease (P = 0.4484). There was a trend for a higher probability of progression in the neoadjuvant arm in patients with positive and negative surgical margins (P = 0.0105, P = 0.0459; alpha = 0.005 with Bonferroni adjustment). CONCLUSIONS:Neoadjuvant androgen ablation with CPA reduces the positive margin rate significantly but does not result in a difference in biochemical progression at 3 years. This may be due to a lack of sufficient follow-up, insufficient power of the trial to demonstrate a small benefit, or a true lack of benefit of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy reduces the likelihood of biochemical progression at 36 months. METHODS: Two hundred thirteen patients with localized prostate cancer were randomized to radical prostatectomy alone (Sx, n = 101) or a 12-week course of 300 mg of cyproterone acetate daily followed by surgery (CPA, n = 112). Biochemical progression (two consecutive detectable prostate-specific antigen [PSA] values) was determined for the entire group and by baseline PSA, Gleason score, clinical stage, and pathologic stage. RESULTS: The probability of biochemical progression at 36 months was similar in both groups (CPA 40.2%, Sx 30.1%; P = 0.3233). CPA patients with baseline serum PSA between 25 and 50 ng/mL had a lower probability of biochemical progression (CPA 63.5%, Sx 84.6%; P = 0.0038). No difference in the probability of biochemical progression was seen between groups when analyzed by clinical stage or Gleason score. When analyzed by pathologic margin status, no difference was observed in the probability of biochemical progression in patients with organ-confined disease (P = 0.4484). There was a trend for a higher probability of progression in the neoadjuvant arm in patients with positive and negative surgical margins (P = 0.0105, P = 0.0459; alpha = 0.005 with Bonferroni adjustment). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant androgen ablation with CPA reduces the positive margin rate significantly but does not result in a difference in biochemical progression at 3 years. This may be due to a lack of sufficient follow-up, insufficient power of the trial to demonstrate a small benefit, or a true lack of benefit of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy.
Authors: Tianzhu Zang; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Daniel Tamae; Wanling Xie; Clementina Mesaros; Zhenwei Zhang; Glenn Bubley; Bruce Montgomery; Steven P Balk; Elahe A Mostaghel; Ian A Blair; Trevor M Penning Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Mary-Ellen Taplin; Bruce Montgomery; Christopher J Logothetis; Glenn J Bubley; Jerome P Richie; Bruce L Dalkin; Martin G Sanda; John W Davis; Massimo Loda; Lawrence D True; Patricia Troncoso; Huihui Ye; Rosina T Lis; Brett T Marck; Alvin M Matsumoto; Steven P Balk; Elahe A Mostaghel; Trevor M Penning; Peter S Nelson; Wanling Xie; Zhenyang Jiang; Christopher M Haqq; Daniel Tamae; NamPhuong Tran; Weimin Peng; Thian Kheoh; Arturo Molina; Philip W Kantoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Catherine O'Brien; Lawrence D True; Celestia S Higano; Brooks L S Rademacher; Mark Garzotto; Tomasz M Beer Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.493