Literature DB >> 10197829

Education and peer discussion group interventions and adjustment to breast cancer.

V S Helgeson1, S Cohen, R Schulz, J Yasko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report a clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of education-based and peer discussion-based group interventions on adjustment to breast cancer.
METHODS: Women with stage I, II, or III breast cancer (n = 312) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 group conditions: control, education, peer discussion, or education plus peer discussion (combination). Seven groups (each comprising 8-12 women) were conducted in each of the 4 conditions (28 groups total). Adjustment was measured before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.
RESULTS: Consistently positive effects on adjustment were seen in the education groups both immediately following and 6 months after the intervention. There were no benefits of participation in peer discussion groups, and some indications of adverse effects on adjustment at both follow-up examinations. The effects could be explained by changes in self-esteem, body image, and intrusive thoughts about the illness.
CONCLUSIONS: Education-based group interventions facilitated the initial adjustment of women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. There was no evidence of benefits from peer discussion group interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10197829     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.4.340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  60 in total

Review 1.  Effect of sex and gender on psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer.

Authors:  A Kiss; S Meryn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-03

Review 2.  Biobehavioral outcomes following psychological interventions for cancer patients.

Authors:  Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-06

3.  Antecedents and mediators of community connection in African American women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Sue P Heiney; Linda J Hazlett; Sally P Weinrich; Linda M Wells; Swann Arp Adams; Sandra Millon Underwood; Rudolph S Parrish
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Cognitive behavioral therapy techniques for distress and pain in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kristin Tatrow; Guy H Montgomery
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-01-07

5.  Identifying the informational and psychosocial needs of Chinese immigrant cancer patients: a focus group study.

Authors:  Jennifer Leng; Trevor Lee; Umut Sarpel; Jessy Lau; Yanjun Li; Connie Cheng; Ming-der Chang; Francesca Gany
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Survivor centrality among breast cancer survivors: implications for well-being.

Authors:  Vicki S Helgeson
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Mediators of a coping and communication-enhancing intervention and a supportive counseling intervention among women diagnosed with gynecological cancers.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Gary Winkel; Stephen Rubin; Mitchell Edelson; Norman Rosenblum; Cynthia Bergman; Enrique Hernandez; John Carlson; Thomas Rocereto
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2008-12

Review 8.  Characteristics and methodological quality of 25 years of research investigating psychosocial interventions for cancer patients.

Authors:  Anne Moyer; Stephanie J Sohl; Sarah K Knapp-Oliver; Stefan Schneider
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 9.  Nuevo Amanecer: results of a randomized controlled trial of a community-based, peer-delivered stress management intervention to improve quality of life in Latinas with breast cancer.

Authors:  Anna María Nápoles; Carmen Ortíz; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson; Anita L Stewart; Steven Gregorich; Howard E Lee; Ysabel Durón; Peggy McGuire; Judith Luce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  Mediators of change in psychosocial interventions for cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anne Moyer; Matthew Goldenberg; Matthew A Hall; Sarah K Knapp-Oliver; Stephanie J Sohl; Elizabeth A Sarma; Stefan Schneider
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.