Literature DB >> 10197571

Longitudinal assessment of energy balance in well-nourished, pregnant women.

L E Kopp-Hoolihan1, M D van Loan, W W Wong, J C King.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinicians often recommend an additional energy intake of 1250 kJ/d to their pregnant patients. Previous studies have shown considerable variation in the metabolic response to pregnancy and thus in the additional energy required to support a pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess how well-nourished women meet the energy demands of pregnancy and to identify factors that predict an individual's metabolic response.
DESIGN: Resting metabolic rate (RMR), diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT), total energy expenditure (TEE), activity energy expenditure (AEE), energy intake (EI), and body fat mass (FM) were measured longitudinally in 10 women preconception; at 8-10, 24-26, and 34-36 wk of gestation; and 4-6 wk postpartum.
RESULTS: Compared with preconception values, individual RMRs increased from 456 to 3389 kJ/d by late pregnancy. DIT varied from -266 to 110 kJ/meal, TEE from -105 to 3421 kJ/d, AEE from -2301 to 2929 kJ/d, EI from -259 to 2176 kJ/d, and FM from a 0.6-kg loss to a 10.6-kg gain. The only prepregnant factor that predicted FM gain was RMR (r = 0.65, P < 0.05). Women with the largest cumulative increase in RMR deposited the least FM (r = -0.64, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Well-nourished women use different strategies to meet the energy demands of pregnancy, including reductions in DIT or AEE, increases in EI, and deposition of less FM than anticipated. The combination of strategies used by individual women is not wholly predictable from prepregnant indexes. The use of a single recommendation for increased energy intake in all pregnant women is not justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10197571     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/69.4.697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  23 in total

1.  Dynamic energy-balance model predicting gestational weight gain.

Authors:  Diana M Thomas; Jesus E Navarro-Barrientos; Daniel E Rivera; Steven B Heymsfield; Carl Bredlau; Leanne M Redman; Corby K Martin; Sally A Lederman; Linda M Collins; Nancy F Butte
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Anatomical, physiological and metabolic changes with gestational age during normal pregnancy: a database for parameters required in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling.

Authors:  Khaled Abduljalil; Penny Furness; Trevor N Johnson; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Hora Soltani
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  How much do pregnant women need to eat - should we intervene?

Authors:  Doris Campbell
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Gestation-Specific Changes in the Anatomy and Physiology of Healthy Pregnant Women: An Extended Repository of Model Parameters for Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Pregnancy.

Authors:  André Dallmann; Ibrahim Ince; Michaela Meyer; Stefan Willmann; Thomas Eissing; Georg Hempel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Evidence-based recommendations for energy intake in pregnant women with obesity.

Authors:  Jasper Most; Marshall St Amant; Daniel S Hsia; Abby D Altazan; Diana M Thomas; L Anne Gilmore; Porsha M Vallo; Robbie A Beyl; Eric Ravussin; Leanne M Redman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  A truncated progesterone receptor (PR-M) localizes to the mitochondrion and controls cellular respiration.

Authors:  Qunsheng Dai; Anish A Shah; Rachana V Garde; Bryan A Yonish; Li Zhang; Neil A Medvitz; Sara E Miller; Elizabeth L Hansen; Carrie N Dunn; Thomas M Price
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-03-21

7.  The doubly labeled water method produces highly reproducible longitudinal results in nutrition studies.

Authors:  William W Wong; Susan B Roberts; Susan B Racette; Sai Krupa Das; Leanne M Redman; James Rochon; Manjushri V Bhapkar; Lucinda L Clarke; William E Kraus
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 8.  Techniques to measure free-living energy expenditure during pregnancy - A guide for clinicians and researchers.

Authors:  Minoli V Abeysekera; Jack A Morris; Anthony J O'Sullivan
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-03-27

9.  Assessing diet quality in a population of low-income pregnant women: a comparison between Native Americans and whites.

Authors:  Vanessa Watts; Helaine Rockett; Heather Baer; Jill Leppert; Graham Colditz
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-12-27

10.  Major influences on nutrient intake in pregnant New Zealand women.

Authors:  Patricia E Watson; Barry W McDonald
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.