K G Dewey1, R J Cohen, K H Brown, L L Rivera. 1. Department of Nutrition and the Program in International Nutrition, University of California, Davis 95616-8669, USA. kgdewey@ucdavis.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal age at which to introduce complementary foods is a topic of considerable debate. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate this issue in a nutritionally vulnerable population in Honduras. DESIGN:Mothers of low-birth-weight (1500-2500 g) term (ie, small-for-gestational-age) infants were recruited in the hospital and assisted with exclusive breast-feeding during the first 4 mo. At 4 mo, mothers were randomly assigned to either continue exclusive breast-feeding to 6 mo (EBF; n = 59) or to feed complementary solid foods (jarred rice cereal, chicken, and fruit and vegetables) twice daily from 4 to 6 mo while continuing to breast-feed at their initial frequency (SF; n = 60). At 4 and 6 mo, breast milk and total energy intake were measured for a nonrandom subsample (those who could stay overnight in a central unit: 32 EBF and 31 SF). RESULTS: At 4 mo, breast milk intake in the subsample was not significantly different between groups (EBF: 729 +/- 135 g/d; SF: 683 +/- 151 g/d: P >0.2); from 4 to 6 mo it increased (by 28 g/d) in the EBF group but decreased (by 39 g/d) in the SF group (P < 0.005). Nonetheless, total energy intake (including solid foods) increased more from 4 to 6 mo in the SF than in the EBF group. However, there were no significant differences between groups in weight or length gain during the intervention or subsequently (6-12 mo). CONCLUSION: There was no growth advantage of complementary feeding of small-for-gestational-age, breast-fed infants between 4 and 6 mo of age.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The optimal age at which to introduce complementary foods is a topic of considerable debate. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate this issue in a nutritionally vulnerable population in Honduras. DESIGN: Mothers of low-birth-weight (1500-2500 g) term (ie, small-for-gestational-age) infants were recruited in the hospital and assisted with exclusive breast-feeding during the first 4 mo. At 4 mo, mothers were randomly assigned to either continue exclusive breast-feeding to 6 mo (EBF; n = 59) or to feed complementary solid foods (jarred rice cereal, chicken, and fruit and vegetables) twice daily from 4 to 6 mo while continuing to breast-feed at their initial frequency (SF; n = 60). At 4 and 6 mo, breast milk and total energy intake were measured for a nonrandom subsample (those who could stay overnight in a central unit: 32 EBF and 31 SF). RESULTS: At 4 mo, breast milk intake in the subsample was not significantly different between groups (EBF: 729 +/- 135 g/d; SF: 683 +/- 151 g/d: P >0.2); from 4 to 6 mo it increased (by 28 g/d) in the EBF group but decreased (by 39 g/d) in the SF group (P < 0.005). Nonetheless, total energy intake (including solid foods) increased more from 4 to 6 mo in the SF than in the EBF group. However, there were no significant differences between groups in weight or length gain during the intervention or subsequently (6-12 mo). CONCLUSION: There was no growth advantage of complementary feeding of small-for-gestational-age, breast-fed infants between 4 and 6 mo of age.
Authors: Maria Hermoso; Garden Tabacchi; Iris Iglesia-Altaba; Silvia Bel-Serrat; Luis A Moreno-Aznar; Yurena García-Santos; Ma del Rosario García-Luzardo; Beatriz Santana-Salguero; Luis Peña-Quintana; Lluis Serra-Majem; Victoria Hall Moran; Fiona Dykes; Tamás Decsi; Vassiliki Benetou; Maria Plada; Antonia Trichopoulou; Monique M Raats; Esmée L Doets; Cristiana Berti; Irene Cetin; Berthold Koletzko Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Jonathan C K Wells; Olof H Jonsdottir; Patricia L Hibberd; Mary S Fewtrell; Inga Thorsdottir; Simon Eaton; Alan Lucas; Geir Gunnlaugsson; Ronald E Kleinman Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Emily Oken; Rita Patel; Lauren B Guthrie; Konstantin Vilchuck; Natalia Bogdanovich; Natalia Sergeichick; Tom M Palmer; Michael S Kramer; Richard M Martin Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Ketil Størdal; Karen M Lundeby; Anne L Brantsæter; Margaretha Haugen; Britt Nakstad; Nicolai A Lund-Blix; Lars C Stene Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Kathryn G Dewey; Mette G Hawck; Kenneth H Brown; Anna Lartey; Roberta J Cohen; Janet M Peerson Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Jessica G Woo; M Lourdes Guerrero; Guillermo M Ruiz-Palacios; Yong-mei Peng; Patricia M Herbers; Wen Yao; Hilda Ortega; Barbara S Davidson; Robert J McMahon; Ardythe L Morrow Journal: J Nutr Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 4.798