Literature DB >> 10197569

Age of introduction of complementary foods and growth of term, low-birth-weight, breast-fed infants: a randomized intervention study in Honduras.

K G Dewey1, R J Cohen, K H Brown, L L Rivera.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal age at which to introduce complementary foods is a topic of considerable debate.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate this issue in a nutritionally vulnerable population in Honduras.
DESIGN: Mothers of low-birth-weight (1500-2500 g) term (ie, small-for-gestational-age) infants were recruited in the hospital and assisted with exclusive breast-feeding during the first 4 mo. At 4 mo, mothers were randomly assigned to either continue exclusive breast-feeding to 6 mo (EBF; n = 59) or to feed complementary solid foods (jarred rice cereal, chicken, and fruit and vegetables) twice daily from 4 to 6 mo while continuing to breast-feed at their initial frequency (SF; n = 60). At 4 and 6 mo, breast milk and total energy intake were measured for a nonrandom subsample (those who could stay overnight in a central unit: 32 EBF and 31 SF).
RESULTS: At 4 mo, breast milk intake in the subsample was not significantly different between groups (EBF: 729 +/- 135 g/d; SF: 683 +/- 151 g/d: P >0.2); from 4 to 6 mo it increased (by 28 g/d) in the EBF group but decreased (by 39 g/d) in the SF group (P < 0.005). Nonetheless, total energy intake (including solid foods) increased more from 4 to 6 mo in the SF than in the EBF group. However, there were no significant differences between groups in weight or length gain during the intervention or subsequently (6-12 mo).
CONCLUSION: There was no growth advantage of complementary feeding of small-for-gestational-age, breast-fed infants between 4 and 6 mo of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10197569     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/69.4.679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  24 in total

Review 1.  The nutritional requirements of infants. Towards EU alignment of reference values: the EURRECA network.

Authors:  Maria Hermoso; Garden Tabacchi; Iris Iglesia-Altaba; Silvia Bel-Serrat; Luis A Moreno-Aznar; Yurena García-Santos; Ma del Rosario García-Luzardo; Beatriz Santana-Salguero; Luis Peña-Quintana; Lluis Serra-Majem; Victoria Hall Moran; Fiona Dykes; Tamás Decsi; Vassiliki Benetou; Maria Plada; Antonia Trichopoulou; Monique M Raats; Esmée L Doets; Cristiana Berti; Irene Cetin; Berthold Koletzko
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Randomized controlled trial of 4 compared with 6 mo of exclusive breastfeeding in Iceland: differences in breast-milk intake by stable-isotope probe.

Authors:  Jonathan C K Wells; Olof H Jonsdottir; Patricia L Hibberd; Mary S Fewtrell; Inga Thorsdottir; Simon Eaton; Alan Lucas; Geir Gunnlaugsson; Ronald E Kleinman
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Effects of an intervention to promote breastfeeding on maternal adiposity and blood pressure at 11.5 y postpartum: results from the Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial, a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Emily Oken; Rita Patel; Lauren B Guthrie; Konstantin Vilchuck; Natalia Bogdanovich; Natalia Sergeichick; Tom M Palmer; Michael S Kramer; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Breast-feeding and Infant Hospitalization for Infections: Large Cohort and Sibling Analysis.

Authors:  Ketil Størdal; Karen M Lundeby; Anne L Brantsæter; Margaretha Haugen; Britt Nakstad; Nicolai A Lund-Blix; Lars C Stene
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.839

5.  Infant weight-for-length is positively associated with subsequent linear growth across four different populations.

Authors:  Kathryn G Dewey; Mette G Hawck; Kenneth H Brown; Anna Lartey; Roberta J Cohen; Janet M Peerson
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Relationship of exclusive breast feeding for 6 mo to linear growth up to 18 mo of age.

Authors:  Kailash Nath Agarwal; Dev K Agarwal; Arti Gupta; Ajay Kr Bansal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Specific infant feeding practices do not consistently explain variation in anthropometry at age 1 year in urban United States, Mexico, and China cohorts.

Authors:  Jessica G Woo; M Lourdes Guerrero; Guillermo M Ruiz-Palacios; Yong-mei Peng; Patricia M Herbers; Wen Yao; Hilda Ortega; Barbara S Davidson; Robert J McMahon; Ardythe L Morrow
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Undernutrition Among Infants and Children in Nepal: Maternal Health Services and Their Roles to Prevent it.

Authors:  Khem Pokhrel; Keiko Nanishi; Krishna C Poudel; Kalpana Gaulee Pokhrel; Kalpana Tiwari; Masamine Jimba
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-10

9.  Why are babies weaned early? Data from a prospective population based cohort study.

Authors:  C M Wright; K N Parkinson; R F Drewett
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 10.  Weaning of infants.

Authors:  K D Foote; L D Marriott
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.