Literature DB >> 10196423

Classification of the hip.

O H Brady1, D S Garbuz, B A Masri, C P Duncan.   

Abstract

A number of classification systems have been proposed for periprosthetic fractures of the femur following total hip replacement. Most of these rely purely on the site and pattern of the fracture. However, it is only after consideration of other important factors, including the stability of the prosthesis as well as the quality of the surrounding bone stock, that appropriate management can be instituted. The authors have developed a new classification system that addresses these other important factors. The authors believe that only after classifying a periprosthetic fracture with specific reference to fracture site, stability of the implant, and quality of the surrounding bone stock, can one make a rational decision towards a treatment algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10196423     DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70076-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  28 in total

1.  Femoral cortical thickness influences the pattern of proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures with a cemented stem.

Authors:  Jarrad Stevens; Nicholas Clement; Michael Nasserallah; Michael Millar; Sam Joseph
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-08

2.  Outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip replacement treated with polyaxial locking plate.

Authors:  M F Hoffmann; S Lotzien; T A Schildhauer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-06

3.  The Modular Universal Tumour And Revision System (MUTARS®) in endoprosthetic revision surgery.

Authors:  Carsten Gebert; Martin Wessling; Christian Götze; Georg Gosheger; Jendrik Hardes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Extracortical plate fixation with new plate inserts and cerclage wires for the treatment of periprosthetic hip fractures.

Authors:  Johannes D Bastian; Andre Butscher; Gianni Bigolin; Matthias A Zumstein; Hubert P Nötzli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Management of late periprosthetic femur fractures: a retrospective cohort of 72 patients.

Authors:  Cibu Mukundan; Faizal Rayan; Ehab Kheir; D Macdonald
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur: the stability of the implant dictates the type of treatment.

Authors:  Francesco Biggi; Stefano Di Fabio; Corrado D'Antimo; Silvia Trevisani
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03

7.  [Results and complications in the treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures with a locked plate system].

Authors:  J Pressmar; F Macholz; W Merkert; F Gebhard; U C Liener
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Megaprosthetic reconstruction for periprosthetic or highly comminuted fractures of the hip and knee.

Authors:  Fredrik Lundh; Arkan S Sayed-Noor; Otte Brosjö; Henrik Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-05-21

Review 9.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures--incidence, classification problems and the proposal of a modified classification scheme.

Authors:  Stephan Frenzel; Vilmos Vécsei; Lukas Negrin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a survivorship analysis.

Authors:  R E Cook; P J Jenkins; P J Walmsley; J T Patton; C M Robinson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.