Literature DB >> 10194964

Gender differences in late positive components evoked by human faces.

J C Oliver-Rodríguez1, Z Guan, V S Johnston.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in male and female participants in response to 32 male and 32 female faces. Participants were instructed to simply look carefully at each face; after ERP collection they were asked to rate each face on a 5-point attractiveness scale. A positive correlation between average rating and average P300 scores to opposite sex faces was observed in male (r = .40) and in preovulatory (r = .41) and postovulatory (r = .44) female subjects. Correlations to same sex faces were only found in postovulatory females (r = .61). Male participants showed a much larger average P300 than did female participants, and the P300 evoked in female participants was unexpectedly larger to female than to male faces. Neither task relevance nor stimulus probability is a plausible explanations for these findings because they were experimentally controlled. These results support the emotional value hypothesis, according to which classical P300 processes reflect an affective evaluation of the stimulus, which in turn produces context updating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10194964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  22 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence of perceived sexual attractiveness for human female bodies varying in waist-to-hip ratio.

Authors:  Marzia Del Zotto; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Neural correlates of perceived risk: the case of HIV.

Authors:  Ralf Schmälzle; Britta Renner; Harald T Schupp
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  The temporal electrocortical profile of emotive facial processing in depressed males and females and healthy controls.

Authors:  Natalia Jaworska; Pierre Blier; Wendy Fusee; Verner Knott
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  Gender difference in event related potentials to masked emotional stimuli in the oddball task.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Seung-Hwan Lee; Gewnhi Park; Sangrae Kim; Imyel Kim; Jeong-Ho Chae; Hyun Taek Kim
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  Spatiotemporal mapping of sex differences during attentional processing.

Authors:  Andres H Neuhaus; Carolin Opgen-Rhein; Carsten Urbanek; Melanie Gross; Eric Hahn; Thi Minh Tam Ta; Simone Koehler; Michael Dettling
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Early cortical processing of natural and artificial emotional faces differs between lower and higher socially anxious persons.

Authors:  Andreas Mühlberger; Matthias J Wieser; Martin J Herrmann; Peter Weyers; Christian Tröger; Paul Pauli
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory.

Authors:  Annekathrin Schacht; Katja Werheid; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Differences in Expressivity Based on Attractiveness: Target or Perceiver Effects?

Authors:  Jennifer L Rennels; Andrea J Kayl
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-09-01

9.  Gender and weight shape brain dynamics during food viewing.

Authors:  Ulrike Toepel; Jean-François Knebel; Julie Hudry; Johannes le Coutre; Micah M Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Asymmetric correlation between experienced parental attachment and event-related potentials evoked in response to parental faces.

Authors:  Junqiang Dai; Hongchang Zhai; Anbang Zhou; Yongyuan Gong; Lin Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.