Literature DB >> 10193944

Preoperative prognostic variables and the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy on the outcomes of Stage IB or II cervical carcinoma patients with or without pelvic lymph node metastases: an analysis of 891 cases.

C H Lai1, J H Hong, S Hsueh, K K Ng, T C Chang, C J Tseng, H H Chou, K G Huang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate pretreatment variables that could predict prognosis and to evaluate the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy on the outcomes of patients with Stage IB or II cervical carcinoma with or without pelvic lymph node metastases.
METHODS: Eight hundred ninety-one patients with Stage IB or II cervical carcinoma who underwent radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy as primary treatment at a single institution were analyzed. Potential prognostic variables were studied.
RESULTS: Among the variables that could be assessed before treatment, depth of cervical stromal invasion (determined by magnetic resonance imaging), clinical stage, tumor size, grade of differentiation, and DNA index (determined by flow cytometry) were independent predictors of outcome in multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model. Three distinct prognostic groups (low, intermediate, and high risk) were defined using these variables. Five-year recurrence free survival (RFS) rates for the low, intermediate, and high risk groups were 94.6%, 82.7%, and 62.3%, respectively (P = 0.0001), and overall survival (OS) rates were 98.4%, 84.5%, and 68.7%, respectively (P = 0.0001). Among patients with pelvic lymph node metastases who were free of parametrial extension, those who received postoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy had significantly better RFS (P = 0.017) and OS (P = 0.043) than those who received no adjuvant therapy. Among patients without pelvic lymph node metastases but at high risk of recurrence, those who received adjuvant radiotherapy had significantly better RFS (P = 0.015) and marginally improved OS (P = 0.087) compared with those who received no adjuvant therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: A model containing assessable pretreatment variables for predicting the prognoses of patients with early stage cervical carcinoma was formulated. Subsets of patients for whom postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy might be beneficial were identified. The data from this retrospective review may be useful when future prospective trials of the treatment of early stage cervical carcinoma are designed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10193944     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990401)85:7<1537::aid-cncr15>3.0.co;2-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

Review 1.  Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of pelvic metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Shen; H Zhou; Z Jia; H Deng
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Koji Matsuo; Yongmei Huang; Ana I Tergas; June Y Hou; Fady Khoury-Collado; Caryn M St Clair; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  A phase I study of adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent paclitaxel and cisplatin for cervical cancer patients with high risk factors.

Authors:  Pei Shu; Yali Shen; Yaqin Zhao; Feng Xu; Meng Qiu; Qiu Li; Hongfeng Gou; Dan Cao; Yu Yang; Jiyan Liu; Cheng Yi; Zhengyin Liao; Deyun Luo; Feng Bi; Xin Wang; Zhiping Li
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Perineural invasion in early-stage cervical cancer and its relevance following surgery.

Authors:  Yi Zhu; Guonan Zhang; Yan Yang; Ling Cui; Shijun Jia; Yu Shi; Shuiqin Song; Shiqiang Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  A randomized controlled study of single-agent cisplatin and radiotherapy versus docetaxel/cisplatin and radiotherapy in high-risk early-stage cervical cancer after radical surgery.

Authors:  Juan Pu; Shan-shan Qin; Jin-xia Ding; Yan Zhang; Wei-guo Zhu; Chang-hua Yu; Tao Li; Guang-zhou Tao; Fu-zhi Ji; Xi-lei Zhou; Ji-hua Han; Ya-lin Ji; Jun-xia Sun
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Clinical value of serum HMGB1 levels in early detection of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix: comparison with serum SCCA, CYFRA21-1, and CEA levels.

Authors:  Xiugui Sheng; Xuelian Du; Xiaoling Zhang; Dapeng Li; Chunhua Lu; Qinshui Li; Zhifang Ma; Quqing Song; Cong Wang
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.351

8.  Accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koji Murakami; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Kaji; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Preoperative PET/CT FDG standardized uptake value of pelvic lymph nodes as a significant prognostic factor in patients with uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Gi Jeong Cheon; Keon Wook Kang; Jae Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Embryologically based resection of cervical cancers: a new concept of surgical radicality.

Authors:  Attibele Palaksha Manjunath; Shivarudraiah Girija
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.