Literature DB >> 10193788

Distinction between surmountable and insurmountable selective AT1 receptor antagonists by use of CHO-K1 cells expressing human angiotensin II AT1 receptors.

P M Vanderheyden1, F L Fierens, J P De Backer, N Fraeyman, G Vauquelin.   

Abstract

1. CHO-K1 cells that were stably transfected with the gene for the human AT1 receptor (CHO-AT1 cells) were used for pharmacological studies of non-peptide AT1 receptor antagonists. 2. In the presence of 10 mM LiCl, angiotensin II caused a concentration-dependent and long-lasting increase of inositol phosphates accumulation with an EC50 of 3.4 nM. No angiotensin II responses are seen in wild-type CHO-K1 cells. 3. [3H]-Angiotensin II bound to cell surface AT1 receptors (dissociates under mild acidic conditions) and is subject to rapid internalization. 4. Non-peptide selective AT1 antagonists inhibited the angiotensin II (0.1 microM) induced IP accumulation and the binding of [3H]-angiotensin II (1 nM) with the potency order: candesartan > EXP3174 > irbesartan > losartan. Their potencies are lower in the presence of bovine serum albumin. 5. Preincubation with the insurmountable antagonist candesartan decreased the maximal angiotensin II induced inositol phosphate accumulation up to 94% and, concomitantly, decreased the maximal binding capacity of the cell surface receptors. These inhibitory effects were half-maximal for 0.6 nM candesartan and were attenuated by simultaneous preincubation with 1 microM losartan indicating a syntopic action of both antagonists. 6. Losartan caused a parallel rightward shift of the angiotensin II concentration-response curves and did not affect the maximal binding capacity. EXP3174 (the active metabolite of losartan) and irbesartan showed a mixed-type behavior in both functional and binding studies. 7. Reversal of the inhibitory effect was slower for candesartan as compared with EXP3174 and irbesartan and it was almost instantaneous for losartan, suggesting that the insurmountable nature of selective AT1 receptor antagonists in functional studies was related to their long-lasting inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10193788      PMCID: PMC1571230          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  33 in total

1.  Candesartan (CV-11974) dissociates slowly from the angiotensin AT1 receptor.

Authors:  M Ojima; Y Inada; Y Shibouta; T Wada; T Sanada; K Kubo; K Nishikawa
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1997-01-14       Impact factor: 4.432

2.  Intracellular trafficking of angiotensin II and its AT1 and AT2 receptors: evidence for selective sorting of receptor and ligand.

Authors:  L Hein; L Meinel; R E Pratt; V J Dzau; B K Kobilka
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1997-08

3.  Functional studies but not receptor binding can distinguish surmountable from insurmountable AT1 antagonism.

Authors:  R L Panek; G H Lu; R W Overhiser; T C Major; J C Hodges; D G Taylor
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  In vivo receptor occupancy of the angiotensin II receptor by nonpeptide antagonists: relationship to in vitro affinities and in vivo pharmacologic potency.

Authors:  H T Beauchamp; R S Chang; P K Siegl; R E Gibson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  The conformational change responsible for AT1 receptor activation is dependent upon two juxtaposed asparagine residues on transmembrane helices III and VII.

Authors:  A J Balmforth; A J Lee; P Warburton; D Donnelly; S G Ball
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-02-14       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Pharmacology of LR-B/057, a novel orally active AT1 receptor antagonist.

Authors:  A R Renzetti; P Cucchi; M Guelfi; R Cirillo; A Salimbeni; A Subissi; A Giachetti
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.105

7.  Pharmacological properties of KT3-671, a novel nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist.

Authors:  S Mochizuki; T Sato; K Furuta; K Hase; Y Ohkura; C Fukai; K Kosakai; S Wakabayashi; A Tomiyama
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.105

8.  BMS-180560, an insurmountable inhibitor of angiotensin II-stimulated responses: comparison with losartan and EXP3174.

Authors:  K E Dickinson; R B Cohen; S Skwish; C L Delaney; R P Serafino; M A Poss; Z Gu; D E Ryono; S Moreland; J R Powell
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Non-peptide angiotensin agonist. Functional and molecular interaction with the AT1 receptor.

Authors:  S Perlman; H T Schambye; R A Rivero; W J Greenlee; S A Hjorth; T W Schwartz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-01-27       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Pharmacology of LR-B/081, a new highly potent, selective and orally active, nonpeptide angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist.

Authors:  R Cirillo; A R Renzetti; P Cucchi; M Guelfi; A Salimbeni; S Caliari; A Castellucci; S Evangelista; A Subissi; A Giachetti
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 8.739

View more
  24 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of angiotensin receptor blockade in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Chantal Csajka; Thierry Buclin; Karin Fattinger; Hans R Brunner; Jérôme Biollaz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Elusive equilibrium: the challenge of interpreting receptor pharmacology using calcium assays.

Authors:  Steven J Charlton; Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Long-lasting target binding and rebinding as mechanisms to prolong in vivo drug action.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; Steven J Charlton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Phylogenetic Diversity of Sponge-Associated Fungi from the Caribbean and the Pacific of Panama and Their In Vitro Effect on Angiotensin and Endothelin Receptors.

Authors:  Jessica Bolaños; Luis Fernando De León; Edgardo Ochoa; José Darias; Huzefa A Raja; Carol A Shearer; Andrew N Miller; Patrick Vanderheyden; Andrea Porras-Alfaro; Catherina Caballero-George
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Inhibition of angiotensin II-induced inositol phosphate production by triacid nonpeptide antagonists in CHO cells expressing human AT1 receptors.

Authors:  P M Vanderheyden; I Verheijen; F L Fierens; J P DeBacker; G Vauquelin
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Stephen P H Alexander; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Michael Spedding; John A Peters; Anthony J Harmar
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Irbesartan: an updated review of its use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  A Markham; C M Spencer; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Molecular characterisation of the interactions between olmesartan and telmisartan and the human angiotensin II AT1 receptor.

Authors:  M T Le; M K Pugsley; G Vauquelin; I Van Liefde
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Amphetamine enantiomers inhibit homomeric α7 nicotinic receptor through a competitive mechanism and within the intoxication levels in humans.

Authors:  Daniel R Garton; Sharmaine G Ross; Rafael Maldonado-Hernández; Matthias Quick; José A Lasalde-Dominicci; José E Lizardi-Ortiz
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.250

10.  Characterization of a fluorescent conjugate of the rabbit angiotensin AT(1) receptor.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Fortin; Johanne Bouthillier; Luc Bastien; Dimcho R Bachvarov; François Marceau
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.