Literature DB >> 10193743

A myocardial perfusion reserve index in humans using first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

J H Cullen1, M A Horsfield, C R Reek, G R Cherryman, D B Barnett, N J Samani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) derived from a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique in normal human volunteers and patients with coronary artery disease and to relate MPRI to coronary artery stenosis severity measured with quantitative arteriography.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging could be a useful noninvasive tool in the investigation of ischemic heart disease. However, there have been few studies in humans to quantify myocardial perfusion and myocardial perfusion reserve using MRI and none in patients with coronary disease.
METHODS: Twenty patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease and five normal volunteers underwent both resting and stress (adenosine 140 microg/kg(-1)/min(-1)) first-pass contrast-enhanced MRI examinations (using 0.05 mmol/kg 1 of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Using a tracer kinetic model, the unidirectional transfer constant (K(i)), a perfusion marker for the myocardial uptake of contrast, was computed in each coronary arterial territory. The ratio of K(i) for the rest and stress scans was used to calculate the MPRI. Percent reduction in luminal diameter of coronary lesions was measured using an automated edge-detection algorithm.
RESULTS: Myocardial perfusion reserve index was significantly reduced in patients compared with normal subjects (2.02+/-0.7 vs. 4.21+/-1.16, p < 0.02). For regions supplied by individual vessels, there was a significant negative correlation of MPRI with percent diameter stenosis (r = -0.81, p < 0.01). Importantly, regions supplied by vessels with <40% diameter stenosis (non-flow limiting) had a significantly higher MPRI than regions supplied by stenoses of "intermediate" severity, that is, >40% to 59% diameter stenosis (2.80+/-0.77 and 1.93+/-0.38, respectively, p < 0.02). However, even regions supplied by vessels with <40% diameter stenosis had a significantly lower MPRI than volunteers (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: A myocardial perfusion reserve index derived from first-pass MRI studies can distinguish between normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Furthermore, it provides useful functional information on coronary lesions, particularly where the physiologic significance cannot be predicted accurately from the angiogram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10193743     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00004-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  35 in total

Review 1.  Contrast agents and cardiac MR imaging of myocardial ischemia: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Pierre Croisille; Didier Revel; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: a qualitative approach.

Authors:  Penelope R Sensky; Nilesh J Samani; Christine Reek; Graham R Cherryman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Myocardial perfusion imaging by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Katherine C Wu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance approaches and recent advances in myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Daniel C Lee; Francis J Klocke
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance cardiac perfusion imaging-a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Thomas Schlosser; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Myocardial perfusion imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  High-resolution myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 T: comparison to 1.5 T in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  K Strach; C Meyer; D Thomas; C P Naehle; C Schmitz; H Litt; A Bernstein; B Cheng; H Schild; T Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Automatic postprocessing for the assessment of quantitative human myocardial perfusion using MRI.

Authors:  Andreas Max Weng; Christian Oliver Ritter; Joachim Lotz; Meinrad Joachim Beer; Dietbert Hahn; Herbert Köstler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.