Literature DB >> 10192960

Apodization by the Stiles-Crawford effect moderates the visual impact of retinal image defocus.

X Zhang1, M Ye, A Bradley, L Thibos.   

Abstract

Previous optical modeling of the human eye with large pupils has predicted a larger impact of defocus on the human contrast sensitivity function and modulation transfer function than is observed experimentally. Theory predicts that aberrations and the Stiles-Crawford effect (SCE) should both lead to increased depth of focus, resulting in higher contrast sensitivities and veridical (not phase-reversed) perception over a larger range of spatial frequencies in defocused retinal images. Using a wave optics model, we examine these predictions quantitatively and compare them with psychophysical experiments that measure the effect of defocus on contrast sensitivity and perceived phase reversals. We find that SCE apodization has its biggest effect on defocused image quality when defocus and spherical aberration have the same sign. A model including typical amounts of spherical aberration and pupil apodization provides a dramatically improved prediction of the effects of defocus on contrast sensitivity with large pupils. The SCE can significantly improve defocused image quality and defocused vision, particularly for tasks that require veridical phase perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10192960     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.16.000812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  9 in total

1.  Are normally sighted, visually impaired, and blind pedestrians accurate and reliable at making street crossing decisions?

Authors:  Shirin E Hassan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Impact of pupil transmission apodization on presbyopic through-focus visual performance with spherical aberration.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; HaeWon Jung; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Improving vision by pupil masking.

Authors:  Sergio Bonaque-González; Susana Ríos-Rodríguez; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Influence of spherical aberration, stimulus spatial frequency, and pupil apodisation on subjective refractions.

Authors:  Arthur Bradley; Renfeng Xu; Larry Thibos; Gildas Marin; Martha Hernandez
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Chromatic and wavefront aberrations: L-, M- and S-cone stimulation with typical and extreme retinal image quality.

Authors:  Florent Autrusseau; Larry Thibos; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Impact of contact lens zone geometry and ocular optics on bifocal retinal image quality.

Authors:  Arthur Bradley; Jayoung Nam; Renfeng Xu; Leslie Harman; Larry Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Monocular diplopia due to spherocylindrical refractive errors (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Steven M Archer
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

Review 9.  Bifocal and Multifocal Contact Lenses for Presbyopia and Myopia Control.

Authors:  Laura Remón; Pablo Pérez-Merino; Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo; Ana I Amorim-de-Sousa; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.909

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.