Literature DB >> 10192351

Outcomes in breast cancer patients relative to margin status after treatment with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy: the University of Pennsylvania experience.

M E Peterson1, D J Schultz, C Reynolds, L J Solin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the significance of final microscopic resection margin status on treatment outcomes in women with early breast cancer who are treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An analysis was performed of 1021 consecutive women with clinical Stage I or II invasive carcinoma of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation. Complete gross excision of tumor was performed in all cases, and an axillary staging procedure was performed to determine pathologic axillary lymph node status. The 1021 patients were divided into four groups based on the final microscopic margin from the tumor excision or from the re-excision if performed. These four groups were: (a) 518 patients with negative margins; (b) 124 patients with focally positive margins; (c) 96 patients with focally close margins (< or = 2 mm); and (d) 283 patients with unknown margins.
RESULTS: Local failure was not significantly different in patients with negative, focally positive, focally close or unknown final pathologic margins of resection at 8 years (8% vs. 10% vs. 17% vs. 16%, respectively, p = 0.21). The 8-year outcome also was not different among the four groups for overall survival (86% vs. 83% vs. 88% vs. 81%, respectively, p = 0.13), cause-specific survival (89% vs. 86% vs. 88% vs. 83%, respectively, p = 0.14), no evidence of disease survival (81% vs. 73% vs. 86% vs. 77%, respectively, p = 0.09), and freedom from distant metastases (85% vs. 75% vs. 86% vs. 79%, respectively, p = 0.08).
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that selected patients with focally positive or focally close microscopic resection margins can be treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation with 8-year local control rates and survival rates that are similar to those seen in breast-conservation patients with negative or unknown final resection margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10192351     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00519-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  F Fitzal; O Riedl; R Jakesz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Teaching residents may affect the margin status of breast-conserving operations.

Authors:  Gina R Shirah; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Meredith A Heberer; Lauren I Wikholm; Jonathan J Goodman; Marcia E Bouton; Ian K Komenaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Ultrasound-guided preoperative localization of breast lesions: a good choice.

Authors:  Giorgio Carlino; Pierluigi Rinaldi; Michela Giuliani; Rossella Rella; Enida Bufi; Federico Padovano; Chiara Ciardi; Maurizio Romani; Paolo Belli; Riccardo Manfredi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-10-26

4.  Future perspectives for breast conservation treatment: science & art.

Authors:  Mona P Tan; Edibaldo Silva
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

5.  Variability in the quality of pathology reporting of margin status following breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sarah Persing; Ted A James; John Mace; Andrew Goodwin; Berta Geller
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Breast cancer local therapy: what is its effect on mortality?

Authors:  John R Benson; Katy A T Teo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Breast MR imaging for the assessment of residual disease following initial surgery for breast cancer with positive margins.

Authors:  Julia Krammer; Elissa R Price; Maxine S Jochelson; Elizabeth Watson; Melissa P Murray; Stefan O Schoenberg; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Petra Macaskill; M Luke Marinovich; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population.

Authors:  Rozbeh Torabi; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Prahladbhai N Patel; Harikrishna Dave; Marcia E Bouton; Ian K Komenaka
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Impact of pathological characteristics on local relapse after breast-conserving therapy: a subgroup analysis of the EORTC boost versus no boost trial.

Authors:  Heather A Jones; Ninja Antonini; Augustinus A M Hart; Johannes L Peterse; Jean-Claude Horiot; Françoise Collin; Philip M Poortmans; S Bing Oei; Laurence Collette; Henk Struikmans; Walter F Van den Bogaert; Alain Fourquet; Jos J Jager; Dominic A X Schinagl; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Harry Bartelink
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.