Literature DB >> 26003052

Teaching residents may affect the margin status of breast-conserving operations.

Gina R Shirah1, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu2,3, Meredith A Heberer1, Lauren I Wikholm1, Jonathan J Goodman4, Marcia E Bouton1, Ian K Komenaka5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current study was performed to evaluate the effects of teaching surgical residents on the margin status after lumpectomy.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients from July 2006 to Nov 2009 was performed. The impact of the technical ability of surgical residents to perform lumpectomy was evaluated to determine if there was an effect on the margin status. A logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for clinical variables known to affect the margin status.
RESULTS: Of 106 patients, 19% had positive margins. Residents with unsatisfactory technical skills had a positive margin rate of 34% compared to 8% for residents with satisfactory skills (p = 0.004). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the operating surgeon remained significantly associated with a positive margin status. Operations performed by residents with satisfactory technical skills or by attending surgeons were less likely to have positive margins than those performed by residents with unsatisfactory technical skills (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.86; p = 0.03). After a mean follow-up of 60 months, the breast cancer-specific survival rate was 94%, and there were no local recurrences as a first event.
CONCLUSIONS: The technical ability of residents may affect the margin status after lumpectomy. The importance of teaching surgical residents needs to be considered in future quality of care evaluations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumpectomy; Margin; Resident; Teaching; Technical ability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26003052     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-015-1184-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  24 in total

1.  Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Melanie C Smitt; Kate Horst
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Hospital characteristics and mortality rates.

Authors:  A J Hartz; H Krakauer; E M Kuhn; M Young; S J Jacobsen; G Gay; L Muenz; M Katzoff; R C Bailey; A A Rimm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Comparison of pediatric appendicitis outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.

Authors:  Steven L Lee; Shant Shekherdimian; Vicki Y Chiu
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Relationship of hospital teaching status with quality of care and mortality for Medicare patients with acute MI.

Authors:  J J Allison; C I Kiefe; N W Weissman; S D Person; M Rousculp; J G Canto; S Bae; O D Williams; R Farmer; R M Centor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Effect of work-hours regulations on intensive care unit mortality in United States teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Meeta Prasad; Theodore J Iwashyna; Jason D Christie; Andrew A Kramer; Jeffrey H Silber; Kevin G Volpp; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Risk factors in breast-conservation therapy.

Authors:  J Borger; H Kemperman; A Hart; H Peterse; J van Dongen; H Bartelink
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Hospital teaching intensity, patient race, and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum; Patrick S Romano; Amy K Rosen; Yanli Wang; Yun Teng; Michael J Halenar; Orit Even-Shoshan; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-02

8.  Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma.

Authors:  D E Wazer; T DiPetrillo; R Schmidt-Ullrich; L Weld; T J Smith; D J Marchant; N J Robert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population.

Authors:  Rozbeh Torabi; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Prahladbhai N Patel; Harikrishna Dave; Marcia E Bouton; Ian K Komenaka
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised.

Authors:  R A Cochrane; P Valasiadou; A R M Wilson; S K Al-Ghazal; R D Macmillan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mastectomy technique using a self-designed self-retaining retractor system.

Authors:  Michael Co; Ava Kwong
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Trainees participation in breast cancer surgery: an assistance or a hinderance?

Authors:  Geok Hoon Lim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-12

3.  Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity.

Authors:  Kevin R Kasten; Adam C Celio; Lauren Trakimas; Mark L Manwaring; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.