Literature DB >> 10191747

Can an external frame fixation reduce the movements in the sacroiliac joint? A radiostereometric analysis of 10 patients.

B Sturesson1, A Udén, I Onsten.   

Abstract

To evaluate whether a Hoffmann-Slätis frame can reduce movements in the sacroiliac joints, 10 patients (7 women) with severe posterior pelvic pain of long duration were externally stabilized. The movements were analyzed with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in supine and standing positions, preoperatively and postoperatively with the frame applied. In 2 patients, there was no reduction in the movements with the frame, perhaps because it was not properly tightened. In the remaining 8 patients, the median reduction in rotation was 55% on the left side and 63% on the right side around the helical axes, and 74% around the x-axes on the left side and 66% on the right side. Our data suggest that external fixation using the Hoffmann-Slätis frame, substantially reduces sacroiliac joint mobility in some patients, which must be considered when using the frame as a diagnostic tool. Pre-stressing the frame by tightening the vertical bars before the compression bar is applied is recommended to reduce the risk of this shortcoming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10191747     DOI: 10.3109/17453679909000956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  8 in total

1.  Precision and accuracy measurement of radiostereometric analysis applied to movement of the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Thomas J Kibsgård; Olav Røise; Britt Stuge; Stephan M Röhrl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Three-dimensional movements of the sacroiliac joint: a systematic review of the literature and assessment of clinical utility.

Authors:  Adam Goode; Eric J Hegedus; Philip Sizer; Jean-Michel Brismee; Alison Linberg; Chad E Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

3.  Physiological in vitro sacroiliac joint motion: a study on three-dimensional posterior pelvic ring kinematics.

Authors:  Niels Hammer; Mario Scholze; Thomas Kibsgård; Stefan Klima; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Thomas Seidel; Michael Werner; Ronny Grunert
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-12-09       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications.

Authors:  A Vleeming; M D Schuenke; A T Masi; J E Carreiro; L Danneels; F H Willard
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Authors' response to the letter to the editors by Professor M. T. Cibulka: a critical interpretation of sacroiliac joint movement studies.

Authors:  A Vleeming; M D Schuenke; B Sturesson; F H Willard
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion vs. conservative management for chronic sacroiliac joint pain.

Authors:  David W Polly
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 7.  European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Andry Vleeming; Hanne B Albert; Hans Christian Ostgaard; Bengt Sturesson; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Radiological Assessment of the Sacrofemoral Angle: A Novel Method to Measure the Range of Hip Joint Flexion.

Authors:  Xian-Zhao Wei; Xi-Ming Xu; Fei Wang; Ming Li; Zi-Min Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.