Literature DB >> 10190802

Predictive factors for neoplasia and malignancy in a neck mass.

N Bhattacharyya1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical factors that are able to predict the likelihood of neoplasia and malignancy of cervical masses.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of case series. Data were collected for age, sex, a history of alcohol and tobacco use, mass location, number, bilaterality, size, and duration. Logistic regression was performed to determine which clinical variables were significant in a prediction model for neoplasia and malignancy in a cervical mass.
SETTING: An academic general otolaryngology practice.
RESULTS: Review of 160 open neck biopsies yielded 95 complete cases for regression analysis. Thirty cases of neoplasia (31.6%) and 12 cases of malignancy (12.6%) were noted. For the prediction of neoplasia, logistic regression analysis identified patient age, duration, and size of the mass to be statistically significant. The overall model for neoplasia had positive and negative predictive values of 63.6% and 78.1%, respectively, and an overall accuracy of 74.7%. For the prediction of malignancy, only age was found to be significant. The model for malignancy failed to show any classification utility beyond that of clinical judgment.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of clinical factors, a logistic regression model can distinguish patients who have a low chance for neoplasia in a neck mass, and thereby help avoid unnecessary biopsy. It is not as useful in selecting patients for early biopsy. The strict prediction of malignancy on the basis of clinical variables alone is difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10190802     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.125.3.303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  6 in total

1.  The correlation between clinical prediagnosis and pathology results in the diagnosis of neck masses.

Authors:  Talih Ozdas; Kursat Murat Ozcan; Fatih Ozdogan; Mehmet Ali Cetin; Huseyin Dere
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-11-15

2.  Predictive factors for malignancy in patients with persistent cervical lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Fatih Celenk; Secaattin Gulsen; Elif Baysal; Ismail Aytac; Seval Kul; Muzaffer Kanlikama
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Head and Neck Surgical Oncology Choosing Wisely Campaign: imaging for patients with hoarseness, fine needle aspiration for neck mass, and ultrasound for odynophagia.

Authors:  Antoine Eskander; Eric Monteiro; Dan O'Connell; S Mark Taylor
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-08

4.  Clinical Controversy Surrounding the Differential Diagnosis of Branchiogenic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexander Karatzanis; Kleanthi Mylopotamitaki; Eleni Lagoudaki; Emmanuel Prokopakis; Sofia Agelaki
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-16

Review 5.  Critical review of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of neck mass in adults.

Authors:  Kevin Chorath; Aman Prasad; Neil Luu; Beatrice Go; Alvaro Moreira; Karthik Rajasekaran
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-10

6.  Evaluation of the predictive role of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in the diagnosis of lymphoma in patients with asymptomatic and ısolated cervical lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Mehmet Erkan Kaplama; Ahmet Kürşad Güneş; Burak Erden
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.