Literature DB >> 25032107

The correlation between clinical prediagnosis and pathology results in the diagnosis of neck masses.

Talih Ozdas1, Kursat Murat Ozcan2, Fatih Ozdogan3, Mehmet Ali Cetin2, Huseyin Dere2.   

Abstract

The importance of clinical assessment and its contribution to the diagnosis of neck masses was investigated in patients presenting with a neck mass. In our study, we collected the medical history of a total of 127 patients, including 66 males and 61 females, who presented with a neck mass. Physical exams, endoscopic examinations, laboratory tests, a variety of imaging studies, and fine-needle aspiration biopsies were performed. The relationship between age, duration and location of the neck mass, FNAB results, and definitive histopathological diagnosis were investigated as well as the correlation between the consensus diagnosis reached after the evaluation of the medical history, physical examination and imaging studies, and definitive histopathological diagnosis. A strong and positive relationship (p < 0.01) was found between patients' ages and the definitive diagnosis established by histopathological examination. There was no statistically significant relationship (p > 0.05) between the duration and location of the neck mass and definitive diagnosis established by histopathological examination. And no statistically significant relationship (p > 0.05) was found between FNAB results and definitive histopathological diagnosis. Although no statistically significant relationship was found between the characteristics of neck masses and age, duration and location of masses and FNAB results, there was a statistically significant correlation between the pre-diagnosis estimated by ENT specialists and definitive diagnosis established by histopathological examination. A strong and positive relationship (p < 0.01) was found between clinical pre-diagnosis and definitive diagnosis established by histopathological examination. In patients presenting with a neck mass, the diagnosis should be made based on the medical history, physical examination, radiologic imaging and FNAB results, treatment decisions should be based on those findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histopathological diagnosis; Neck mass; Prediagnosis

Year:  2012        PMID: 25032107      PMCID: PMC4071439          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-012-0593-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  5 in total

1.  Establishing the differential diagnosis of neck lesions.

Authors:  J A Giglio; D M Laskin
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.677

2.  Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of head and neck lesions.

Authors:  P M Schelkun; W G Grundy
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Predictive factors for neoplasia and malignancy in a neck mass.

Authors:  N Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-03

Review 4.  The adult neck mass.

Authors:  Eric Schwetschenau; Daniel J Kelley
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 3.292

5.  The neck mass.

Authors:  W F McGuirt
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.456

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.