Literature DB >> 10190511

Does the specific intravascular ultrasound criterion used to optimize stent expansion have an impact on the probability of stent restenosis?

I Moussa1, J Moses, C Di Mario, R Albiero, J De Gregorio, M Adamian, L Di Francesco, A Colombo.   

Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging has been used to optimize stent implantation in coronary arteries, but the criteria used were chosen on an empiric basis. The aim of this study was to determine whether any of these criteria have an independent role in predicting the probability of freedom from restenosis. The study population consisted of 425 patients (496 lesions) who underwent angiographically successful IVUS-guided stenting. Five IVUS criteria were studied: (1) intrastent minimal lumen cross-sectional area (ISMLCSA) > or =9 mm2; (2) ISMLCSA (> or =9 mm2 and > or =80% of average reference lumen cross-sectional area [CSA]); (3) ISMLCSA > or =90% of average reference lumen CSA; (4) ISMLCSA > or =90% of distal reference lumen CSA; and (5) ISMLCSA > or =55% of average reference vessel CSA. These criteria were met in 33%, 29%, 68%, 82%, and 69% of lesions, respectively. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 335 of 421 eligible patients (80%) at 5.3 +/- 2.7 months. An absolute ISMLCSA > or =9 mm2 was associated with the lowest restenosis, but this criterion was primarily achieved in large vessels. The only criterion that was associated with higher probability of freedom from restenosis independently from vessel size was an ISMLCSA > or =55% of average reference vessel CSA. Therefore, when IVUS is used to guide stent implantation an effort should be made to achieve the largest lumen safely possible. An ISMLCSA > or =55% of the average reference vessel CSA seems to be the most appropriate criterion in terms of frequency of achievement and in terms of increasing the probability of freedom from restenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10190511     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00006-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  A novel method of coronary stent sizing using intravascular ultrasound: Safety and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher B Wong; Norman D Hansen
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2009

2.  Incidence of stent under-deployment as a cause of in-stent restenosis in long stents.

Authors:  Olivier F Bertrand; Robert De Larochellière; Michel Joyal; Raoul Bonan; Rosaire Mongrain; Jean-Claude Tardif
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Compliance charts to guide non-complex small artery stenting: validation by quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  Yohan Chacko; J Kimberly Haladyn; Debbie M Smith; Richard Lim
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2013-05-31

4.  Overaggressive stent expansion without intravascular imaging: impact on restenosis.

Authors:  Yohan Chacko; Richard Chan; J Kimberly Haladyn; Richard Lim
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2014-02-27

5.  IVUS-Guided Stent Implantation to Improve Outcome: A Promise Waiting to be Fulfilled.

Authors:  Renata Rogacka; Azeem Latib; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-05

Review 6.  Optimization of stent deployment by intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Seung-Ho Hur
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 7.  Intravascular imaging in coronary stent restenosis: Prevention, characterization, and management.

Authors:  Amr Abouelnour; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.