Literature DB >> 10189323

Use of hormone replacement therapy by postmenopausal women in the United States.

N L Keating1, P D Cleary, A S Rossi, A M Zaslavsky, J Z Ayanian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits and risks of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women are not fully defined, and individual characteristics and preferences may influence decisions to use this therapy. Previous studies of postmenopausal women who use HRT have been conducted in local or highly selected cohorts or have not focused on current use.
OBJECTIVE: To examine sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors associated with current use of HRT in a national population-based cohort.
DESIGN: Random-digit telephone survey.
SETTING: Probability sample of U.S. households with a telephone. PARTICIPANTS: 495 postmenopausal women 50 to 74 years of age in 1995. MEASUREMENTS: Current use of HRT.
RESULTS: Current use of HRT was reported by 37.6% of women (58.7% of those who underwent hysterectomy and 19.6% of those who did not undergo hysterectomy; P = 0.001). In multivariable analyses, use of HRT was more common among women in the South (adjusted odds ratio, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.08 to 6.59]) and West (odds ratio, 2.76 [CI, 1.01 to 7.53]) than the Northeast. Use was more common among college graduates (odds ratio, 3.72 [CI, 1.29 to 10.71]) and less common among women with diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 0.17 [CI, 0.05 to 0.51]). Other cardiac risk factors and most psychological characteristics were not associated with HRT use.
CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic factors, such as region and education, may be more strongly associated with use of HRT than clinical factors, such as risk for cardiovascular disease. Future efforts should focus on understanding sociodemographic variations, defining which women are most likely to benefit, and targeting therapy to them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10189323     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-7-199904060-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  37 in total

1.  Self-reported changes in providers' hormone therapy prescribing and counseling practices after the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Susan L Lakey; Susan D Reed; Andrea Z LaCroix; Lou Grothaus; Katherine M Newton
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  The associations of hormone replacement therapy and preventive practices in minority women.

Authors:  Kalpana Ganesan; Senait Teklehaimanot; Merlyn Asuncion
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Estrogens and age-related memory decline in rodents: what have we learned and where do we go from here?

Authors:  Karyn M Frick
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.587

4.  Dramatic change in prescribing of hormone replacement therapy in The Netherlands after publication of the Million Women Study: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Adrianne Faber; Marcel L Bouvy; Linda Loskamp; Paul B van de Berg; Toine C G Egberts; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Hip fracture risk among community-dwelling elderly people in the United States: a prospective study of physical, cognitive, and socioeconomic indicators.

Authors:  Robin Taylor Wilson; Gary A Chase; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Robert B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Developing profiles of postmenopausal women being prescribed estrogen therapy to prevent osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mayur M Amonkar; Reema Mody
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2002-10

Review 7.  Impact of female hormones on blood pressure: review of potential mechanisms and clinical studies.

Authors:  Jane Morley Kotchen; Theodore A Kotchen
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  Environmental enrichment reduces the mnemonic and neural benefits of estrogen.

Authors:  J E Gresack; K M Frick
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Limited educational attainment and radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional analysis using data from the Johnston County (North Carolina) Osteoarthritis Project.

Authors:  Leigh F Callahan; Jack Shreffler; Bernadette C Siaton; Charles G Helmick; Britta Schoster; Todd A Schwartz; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Jordan B Renner; Joanne M Jordan
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 10.  Progress in osteoporosis and fracture prevention: focus on postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Kenneth G Saag; Piet Geusens
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.