Literature DB >> 10186467

Cost analysis of palliative care for terminally ill cancer patients in the UK after switching from weak to strong opioids. Palliative Care Advisory Committee.

J F Guest1, W M Hart, R F Cookson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We constructed a UK-based decision model of palliative care for terminally ill cancer patients who were switched from a weak to a strong opioid so that the expected direct healthcare costs in the UK could be estimated from the time a patient commenced a strong opioid until death.
DESIGN: Decision analysis techniques were used to estimate the expected total direct healthcare cost per patient, stratified according to the first choice of strong opioid. The model was based on prescription data on 1975 terminally ill cancer patients who were on the Intercontinental Medical Statistics database, Mediplus (IMS Ltd, Middlesex, England). Resource-use data were obtained from published literature, a Delphi Panel and an advisory panel with expertise in palliative care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND
RESULTS: The expected cost of managing terminally ill cancer patients after they switched from a weak to a strong opioid ranged from 2391 pounds sterling (Pounds) to 3701 Pounds at 1995/1996 prices, depending primarily on the patient's duration of survival. Sensitivity analyses showed that the cost could be as low as 1500 Pounds or as high as 6000 Pounds, depending on resource use (at 1995/1996 prices). The key cost drivers were: hospice care, hospitalisation, general practitioner (GP) consultations and specialist nurse visits. In contrast, neither the choice of opioid nor managing constipation impacted substantially on the expected cost. Approximately two-thirds of the expected total cost was incurred by the UK National Health Service (NHS), with the remainder incurred by voluntary and charitable sectors. Hospice care and hospitalisation collectively accounted for between 50 and 80% of the expected costs. Management of patients in the community by the primary healthcare team accounted for between 10 and 40% of the costs. The acquisition cost of opioids accounted for between 2 and 8% of the expected cost and discounting the cost of these drugs sold to hospitals did not impact substantially on the total expected costs. The use of other resources such as antiemetics, NSAIDS, antidepressants and gastrointestinal drugs accounted for up to 3% of the expected cost.
CONCLUSION: The expected cost of palliative care in the UK healthcare setting ranged from approximately 2500 Pounds to 4000 Pounds (1500 Pounds to 6000 Pounds in the sensitivity analysis) depending on the length of survival after patients switch from weak to strong opioids. Since opioids account for only 2 to 8% of expected costs, factors other than economic issues, such as tolerability profile, patient preference and convenience of use, should form the basis of clinical decision-making between opioids with similar analgesic efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10186467     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199814030-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  15 in total

1.  Colorectal, lung, and breast cancer care during the three years following the diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  M Geddes; S Carli; M Ercolanelli; G Forno; M Capelli; A Barchielli
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.098

Review 2.  Economic factors in cancer palliation--methodologic considerations.

Authors:  P J Goodwin
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 12.111

3.  Economics and evaluation of palliative care.

Authors:  C Normand
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained-release oral morphine in cancer pain: preference, efficacy, and quality of life. The TTS-Fentanyl Comparative Trial Group.

Authors:  S Ahmedzai; D Brooks
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  A cost analysis of Nd:YAG laser ablation versus endoscopic intubation for the palliation of malignant dysphagia.

Authors:  M J Sculpher; I R Sargeant; L A Loizou; S M Thorpe; G M Spencer; S G Bown
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Palliative care services: what needs assessment?

Authors:  M A Robbins; S J Frankel
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  The costs of managing severe cancer pain and potential savings from transdermal administration.

Authors:  K Bloor; B Leese; A Maynard
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Current status of the Global Cancer Control Program of the World Health Organization.

Authors:  J Stjernswärd; N Teoh
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Resource implications of palliative chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  C Doyle; M Stockler; M Pintilie; P Panesar; P Warde; J Sturgeon; A M Oza
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A randomized controlled trial of the cost-effectiveness of a district co-ordinating service for terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  J P Raftery; J M Addington-Hall; L D MacDonald; H R Anderson; J M Bland; J Chamberlain; P Freeling
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.762

View more
  3 in total

1.  Expert judgement in pharmacoeconomic studies. Guidance and future use.

Authors:  C Evans; B Crawford
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomic impact of adverse events of long-term opioid treatment for the management of persistent pain.

Authors:  Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Clinical management and associated costs for moderate and severe Alzheimer's disease in urban China: a Delphi panel study.

Authors:  Xin Yu; Shengdi Chen; Xiaochun Chen; Jianjun Jia; Chunhou Li; Cong Liu; Mondher Toumi; Dominique Milea
Journal:  Transl Neurodegener       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 8.014

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.