Literature DB >> 10182195

The cost of reaching National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goals in hypercholesterolaemic patients. A comparison of atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin and fluvastatin.

M J Koren1, D G Smith, D B Hunninghake, M H Davidson, J M McKenney, S R Weiss, H G Schrott, R W Henley, P Tresh, R W McLain, R G Bakker-Arkema, D M Black.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recognising the importance of treating hyperlipidaemia, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) has established widely accepted treatment goals for low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Medications used most commonly to achieve these LDL-C goals are HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. The relative resource utilisation and cost associated with the use of reductase inhibitors of different LDL-C lowering efficacy are unknown, but are major health and economic concerns. The objective of this study was to determine the mean total cost of care to reach NCEP goals with various reductase inhibitors.
DESIGN: In a randomised, 54-week, 30-centre controlled trial we compared resources used and costs associated with treating patients to achieve NCEP goals using 4 reductase inhibitors: atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin and fluvastatin. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: The trial studied 662 patients; 318 had known atherosclerotic disease.
INTERVENTIONS: Reductase inhibitor therapy was initiated at recommended starting doses and increased according to NCEP guidelines and package insert information. For patients who did not reach the goal at the highest recommended dose of each reductase inhibitor, the resin colestipol was added. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND
RESULTS: Patients treated with atorvastatin, compared-with other reductase inhibitors, were more likely to reach NCEP goals during treatment (p < 0.05), required fewer office visits (p < 0.001) and less adjuvant colestipol therapy (p = 0.001). Consequently, the mean total cost of care (1996 values) to reach NCEP goals was lower with atorvastatin [$US1064; 95% confidence interval (CI): $US953 to $US1176] compared with simvastatin ($US1471, 95% CI: $US1304 to $US1648), lovastatin ($US1972; 95% CI: $US1758 to $US2186) and fluvastatin ($US1542; 95% CI: $US1384 to $US1710). Results were similar for patients with or without known atherosclerotic disease.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring drug therapy for hypercholesterolaemia, NCEP LDL-C goals are achieved significantly more often using fewer resources with atorvastatin compared with simvastatin, lovastatin or fluvastatin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10182195     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199814010-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  23 in total

1.  An analysis of randomized trials evaluating the effect of cholesterol reduction on total mortality and coronary heart disease incidence.

Authors:  I Holme
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Atorvastatin--a new lipid-lowering drug.

Authors: 
Journal:  Med Lett Drugs Ther       Date:  1997-03-28       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.

Authors:  W T Friedewald; R I Levy; D S Fredrickson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II)

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-06-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Cost-effectiveness of pravastatin in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T Ashraf; J W Hay; B Pitt; E Wittels; J Crouse; M Davidson; C D Furberg; L Radican
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators.

Authors:  F M Sacks; M A Pfeffer; L A Moye; J L Rouleau; J D Rutherford; T G Cole; L Brown; J W Warnica; J M Arnold; C C Wun; B R Davis; E Braunwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol lowering. Results from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

Authors:  B Jönsson; M Johannesson; J Kjekshus; A G Olsson; T R Pedersen; H Wedel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Cholesterol and mortality. 30 years of follow-up from the Framingham study.

Authors:  K M Anderson; W P Castelli; D Levy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition for primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  L Goldman; M C Weinstein; P A Goldman; L W Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  J Shepherd; S M Cobbe; I Ford; C G Isles; A R Lorimer; P W MacFarlane; J H McKillop; C J Packard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Cost per millimeter of mercury lowering is a measure of economic value for antihypertensive agents.

Authors:  R S Chen; P Lapuerta
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Augmenting reference pricing of pharmaceuticals in New Zealand with strategic cross-product agreements.

Authors:  A Woodfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Pharmacoeconomics of lipid-lowering drugs.

Authors:  Dean G Smith
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  [Cost analysis and degree of hypercholesterolemia control in type 2 diabetic patients according to different groups and scientific societies].

Authors:  S Narejos; J Espinàs; A Rodríguez; R M Salla; C Blay; A Puente; M Cantero; J Alsina; M C López
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.137

5.  A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of statins in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in the primary care setting in Spain.

Authors:  Pedro J Tárraga-López; Angel Celada-Rodríguez; Miguel Cerdán-Oliver; Juan Solera-Albero; José M Ocaña-López; Mateo A López-Cara; Jaime De Miguel-Clave
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Atorvastatin: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and use in dyslipidaemia.

Authors:  H S Malhotra; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Fluvastatin: a review of its use in lipid disorders.

Authors:  H D Langtry; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  The cost of treating dyslipidaemia using National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines.

Authors:  J M McKenney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  An economic analysis of the Atorvastatin Comparative Cholesterol Efficacy and Safety Study (ACCESS).

Authors:  Dean G Smith; Christopher R McBurney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the Myocardial Ischaemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) study in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Nigel Buller; David Gillen; Roman Casciano; John Doyle; Koo Wilson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.