Literature DB >> 10181502

From selfish individualism to citizenship: avoiding health economics' reputed 'dead end'.

V Wiseman1.   

Abstract

Recent interpretations of citizenship are firmly rooted in the value of social membership and social participation. Citizens are described as having a moral right to draw upon the support of the community, but at the same time have a responsibility to contribute to the provision of social services such as health care. In contrast, contemporary health economics has been criticised for taking a narrow and individualistic view of human behaviour. This paper examines the extent to which economic theory and practice have been developed to accommodate a more 'civic' view, namely, the notions of mutual concern for community members, social participation and social rights. It is argued that because the provision of health care is often linked to feelings of compassion and social responsibility and not just to individual well-being, this sort of insight may enrich economic analysis and, in turn, provide a way around health economics' reputed 'dead end'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10181502     DOI: 10.1007/BF02678117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  10 in total

1.  Examining preferences for allocating health care gains.

Authors:  G Mooney; S Jan; V Wiseman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1995-08

2.  The way around health economics' dead end.

Authors:  D Seedhouse
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1995-08

3.  Critique. The silence of philosophy.

Authors:  M Loughlin
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1994-11

Review 4.  Health promotion community development and the tyranny of individualism.

Authors:  A Shiell; P Hawe
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the 'fair innings' argument.

Authors:  A Williams
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  The significance of age and duration of effect in social evaluation of health care.

Authors:  E Nord; A Street; J Richardson; H Kuhse; P Singer
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-05

7.  Bentham in a box: technology assessment and health care allocation.

Authors:  A R Jonsen
Journal:  Law Med Health Care       Date:  1986-09

8.  National Health Insurance and noncovered services.

Authors:  M D Bayles
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.265

9.  Need: the idea won't do--but we still need it.

Authors:  A J Culyer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Social evaluation of health care versus personal evaluation of health states. Evidence on the validity of four health-state scaling instruments using Norwegian and Australian surveys.

Authors:  E Nord; J Richardson; K Macarounas-Kirchmann
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.188

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  European health systems and the internal market: reshaping ideology?

Authors:  Danielle da Costa Leite Borges
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2011-12

Review 2.  Using the stated preference technique for eliciting valuations: the role of the payment vehicle.

Authors:  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.