Literature DB >> 10151647

Examining preferences for allocating health care gains.

G Mooney1, S Jan, V Wiseman.   

Abstract

This study is part of a programme to elicit and examine community preferences for health care in different contexts. Data were obtained from a group of predominantly Australian health care decision-makers. A short questionnaire contained six valuation questions and four demographic questions. The six valuation questions posed choices where equal health gains were to be allocated to different population groups based upon: age; sex; current health; socio-economic status; across time; and across different numbers of individuals. The results provide some evidence that respondents were prepared to discriminate between health gains derived in different contexts especially where health gains were to be allocated between groups of different health status and over time. Further research is planned and the possible implications for health policy, and in particular for resource allocation in health care, are briefly discussed.

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10151647     DOI: 10.1007/BF02197680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  4 in total

Review 1.  On what basis should health be discounted?

Authors:  J A Olsen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Priority setting: lessons from Oregon.

Authors:  J Dixon; H G Welch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  QALY league tables: handle with care.

Authors:  K Gerard; G Mooney
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public.

Authors:  D L Sackett; G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1978
  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  Culture, self-rated health and resource allocation decision-making.

Authors:  V L Wiseman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1999

Review 2.  A new perspective on economic analysis in health care? A critical review of 'The Economics of Health Reconsidered' by Tom Rice.

Authors:  S Jan
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1999

3.  From selfish individualism to citizenship: avoiding health economics' reputed 'dead end'.

Authors:  V Wiseman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1998-06

4.  The way around health economics' dead end.

Authors:  D Seedhouse
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1995-08

5.  A note on the relative importance that people attach to different factors when setting priorities in health care.

Authors:  Paul Dolan; Rebecca Shaw
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Emily Lancsar; Kylie Rixon; Xanthe Golenko; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Societal preferences for standard health insurance coverage in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ineke van der Wulp; Wilbert B van den Hout; Marieke de Vries; Anne M Stiggelbout; Elske M van den Akker-van Marle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Weighting Health Outcomes by Socioeconomic Position Using Stated Preferences.

Authors:  Anita Lal; Mohammad Siahpush; Marjory Moodie; Anna Peeters; Robert Carter
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2018-03

9.  Pediatric Vaccines and Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: How Much is Too Much to Pay for Prevention?

Authors:  Jordan Amdahl; Derek Weycker; Ray Farkouh; Liping Huang; Caitlin Eichten; Gerry Oster
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2020-11-10

10.  Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Seda Erdem; Carl Thompson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.