Literature DB >> 10181021

A multiple case study of implementation in 10 local Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina.

M C Kegler1, A Steckler, S H Malek, K McLeroy.   

Abstract

Community health promotion relies heavily on coalitions to address a multitude of public health issues. In spite of their widespread use, there have been very few studies of coalitions at various stages of coalition development. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that facilitated or impeded coalition effectiveness in the implementation stage of coalition development. The research design was a multiple case study with cross-case comparisons. Each of the 10 local North Carolina Project ASSIST coalitions constituted a case. Data collection included: semi-structured interviews, observation, document review, and surveys of members and staff. Some of the major factors that facilitated implementation included: the ability of the coalition to provide its own vision, staff with the skills and time to work with the coalition, frequent and productive communication, cohesion or a sense of belonging on the coalition, and complexity of the coalition structure during the intervention phase. Barriers to effective implementation included: staff turnover and staff lacking community organization skills, dependence on the state-level staff during the planning phase and lack of member input into the action plan. Conflict contributed to staff turnover, reluctance to conduct certain activities and difficulty in recruiting members, all of which had implications for implementation.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10181021     DOI: 10.1093/her/13.2.225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  14 in total

1.  The urban context: a place to eliminate health disparities and build organizational capacity.

Authors:  Keon L Gilbert; Sandra Crouse Quinn; Angela F Ford; Stephen B Thomas
Journal:  J Prev Interv Community       Date:  2011

2.  Evaluating large-scale health programmes at a district level in resource-limited countries.

Authors:  Theodore Svoronos; Kedar S Mate
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  PROSPER STUDY OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTION IMPLEMENTATION QUALITY BY COMMUNITY-UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIPS.

Authors:  Richard Spoth; Max Guyll; Catherine J Lillehoj; Cleve Redmond; Mark Greenberg
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2007-10-25

Review 4.  Toward a comprehensive strategy for effective practitioner-scientist partnerships and larger-scale community health and well-being.

Authors:  Richard L Spoth; Mark T Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2005-06

5.  Social networks and community prevention coalitions.

Authors:  Mark E Feinberg; Nathaniel R Riggs; Mark T Greenberg
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2005-07

6.  Community and team member factors that influence the early phase functioning of community prevention teams: the PROSPER project.

Authors:  Mark T Greenberg; Mark E Feinberg; Sarah Meyer-Chilenski; Richard L Spoth; Cleve Redmond
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2007-12-06

7.  Toward dissemination of evidence-based family interventions: maintenance of community-based partnership recruitment results and associated factors.

Authors:  Richard Spoth; Scott Clair; Mark Greenberg; Cleve Redmond; Chungyeol Shin
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2007-06

8.  The longitudinal effect of technical assistance dosage on the functioning of Communities That Care prevention boards in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Mark E Feinberg; Ty A Ridenour; Mark T Greenberg
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2008-03-26

9.  The relative importance of provider, program, school, and community predictors of the implementation quality of school-based prevention programs.

Authors:  Allison Ann Payne; Ronald Eckert
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2010-06

10.  The viability of community partnerships initiated by external funders.

Authors:  Carolyn Berry; Sue A Kaplan; Aileen Reid; Stephanie Albert
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.