Literature DB >> 10180339

A tale of two (or more) cities: geographic transferability of pharmacoeconomic data.

B J O'Brien1.   

Abstract

The economic evaluation of a new medicine often must be based on data gathered in multiple countries. Because replication of trials is an expensive and inefficient undertaking, analysts need to determine the validity of transferring cost-effectiveness data from one country to another. Threats to transferring data involve differences among countries with regard to demography and epidemiology of disease, clinical practice and conventions, incentives to and regulation of healthcare providers, relative price levels, consumer preferences, and opportunity cost of resources. Because of these differences, a drug can be cost-effective in one country and not cost-effective in another. Adapting a cost-effectiveness study conducted in one country to another country requires careful scrutiny of the relevance of comparators, practice patterns, and relative price weights.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10180339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  16 in total

1.  A decision chart for assessing and improving the transferability of economic evaluation results between countries.

Authors:  Robert Welte; Talitha Feenstra; Hans Jager; Reiner Leidl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The analysis of multinational cost-effectiveness data for reimbursement decisions: a critical appraisal of recent methodological developments.

Authors:  Andrea Manca; Mark J Sculpher; Ron Goeree
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  A systematic review of economic evaluation literature in Thailand: are the data good enough to be used by policy-makers?

Authors:  Yot Teerawattananon; Steve Russell; Miranda Mugford
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Costs of hospital-acquired infection and transferability of the estimates: a systematic review.

Authors:  H Fukuda; J Lee; Y Imanaka
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Max Brosa; Carlos Rubio-Terrés; Ibrahim Farr; Vijay Nadipelli; Jenaro Froufe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  'Lost in translation': accounting for between-country differences in the analysis of multinational cost-effectiveness data.

Authors:  Andrea Manca; Andrew R Willan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  The role of models within economic analysis: focus on type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Douglas Coyle; Karen M Lee; Bernie J O'Brien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Hospital selection for unit cost estimates in multicentre economic evaluations. Does the choice of hospitals make a difference?

Authors:  R Goeree; A Gafni; M Hannah; T Myhr; G Blackhouse
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Cost and cost-effectiveness of nationwide school-based helminth control in Uganda: intra-country variation and effects of scaling-up.

Authors:  Simon Brooker; Narcis B Kabatereine; Fiona Fleming; Nancy Devlin
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.344

Review 10.  Economic studies in colorectal cancer: challenges in measuring and comparing costs.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Laurel Borowski; Joseph Lipscomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.