Literature DB >> 12036380

The role of models within economic analysis: focus on type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Douglas Coyle1, Karen M Lee, Bernie J O'Brien.   

Abstract

Economic analysis of healthcare interventions is increasingly reliant on decision models to estimate the long-term costs and benefits of new therapies. Models permit analysts to take short-term clinical data to forecast long-term costs and benefits. Models should follow certain basic principles and can be appraised in terms of three broad characteristics: clinical relevance, transparency and analytical ability. The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of modelling in the economic analysis of interventions for type 2 diabetes mellitus. A review of existing models for diabetes identified five complex disease models appropriate for economic analysis. These models were broadly similar in structure and in source of input parameters. However, models did vary according to the coverage of relevant disease complications and the complexity of analysis possible. Models could be enhanced by improving their transparency and by using data relevant to type 2 diabetes. In addition, enhancing clinical knowledge through the provision of long-term data on effectiveness may reduce concern relating to the appropriateness of the assumptions currently required within models. The value of such further information must be weighed against the costs of its acquisition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12036380     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220001-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  38 in total

1.  A tale of two (or more) cities: geographic transferability of pharmacoeconomic data.

Authors:  B J O'Brien
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 2.  Epidemiology and clinical presentation of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  I W Campbell
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  The journal's policy on cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  J P Kassirer; M Angell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life.

Authors:  M J Buxton; M F Drummond; B A Van Hout; R L Prince; T A Sheldon; T Szucs; M Vray
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Cost savings associated with detection and treatment of diabetic eye disease.

Authors:  J C Javitt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Lifetime benefits and costs of intensive therapy as practiced in the diabetes control and complications trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. The Pioglitazone 027 Study Group.

Authors:  D Einhorn; M Rendell; J Rosenzweig; J W Egan; A L Mathisen; R L Schneider
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  Glycosylated hemoglobin predicts the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  R Klein; B E Klein; S E Moss; M D Davis; D L DeMets
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The impact of diabetes on survival following myocardial infarction in men vs women. The Framingham Study.

Authors:  R D Abbott; R P Donahue; W B Kannel; P W Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-12-16       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Detecting and treating retinopathy in patients with type I diabetes mellitus. Savings associated with improved implementation of current guidelines. American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  J C Javitt; L P Aiello; L J Bassi; Y P Chiang; J K Canner
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Applications of economic models in healthcare: the introduction of pioglitazone in Sweden.

Authors:  Freddie Henriksson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  A role for two-stage pharmacoeconomic appraisal? Is there a role for interim approval of a drug for reimbursement based on modelling studies with subsequent full approval using phase III data?

Authors:  Suzanne Hill; Nick Freemantle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Development of an economic model to assess the cost effectiveness of treatment interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Michael Spencer; Andrew H Briggs; Ronald F Grossman; Laureen Rance
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  HTA agencies facing model biases: the case of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Véronique Raimond; Jean-Michel Josselin; Lise Rochaix
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  A review of methods used in long-term cost-effectiveness models of diabetes mellitus treatment.

Authors:  Jean-Eric Tarride; Robert Hopkins; Gord Blackhouse; James M Bowen; Matthias Bischof; Camilla Von Keyserlingk; Daria O'Reilly; Feng Xie; Ron Goeree
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Economic evaluation of lifestyle interventions for preventing diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Sanjib Saha; Ulf-G Gerdtham; Pia Johansson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.