Literature DB >> 22775294

Colorectal cancer screening and physical activity promotion among obese women: an online evaluation of targeted messages.

Lucia A Leone1, Marci K Campbell, Marlyn Allicock, Michael Pignone.   

Abstract

Obese women are at higher risk for several cancers, but are less likely than normal weight women to engage in cancer prevention behaviors such as screening and physical activity. Targeted health messages may help increase healthy behaviors among vulnerable groups such as obese women. Using findings from focus groups with obese women, the authors created targeted messages to promote colorectal cancer screening and physical activity among obese women. The messages addressed psychosocial constructs, such as benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening and exercise, which were relevant to the target population. Messages were tested online with women age 50 years and older (N = 181). Participants were stratified by weight (obese vs. nonobese) and randomized to review either 10 targeted (intervention) or 10 generic (control) messages. Study outcomes included elaboration about the messages, message relevance and trustworthiness, and behavioral intentions. The authors used moderation and subgroup analyses to determine whether the intervention messages were better received by certain women. They found no differences in elaboration, behavioral intentions, relevance, or trustworthiness between intervention and control for either weight group. However, exercise intentions increased more (p = .06) among inactive obese women who received intervention messages (+2.9) compared with those who were in the control group (+1.2). Intervention messages also produced more elaboration among women who viewed their weight as a barrier to screening or exercise. Tailoring intervention messages for obese women on the basis of behavior and barriers may improve outcomes more than giving the same messages to all obese women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22775294      PMCID: PMC4201496          DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2012.665422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  29 in total

1.  The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.

Authors:  Alfred C Marcus; Mondi Mason; Pam Wolfe; Barbara K Rimer; Isaac Lipkus; Victor Strecher; Richard Warneke; Marion E Morra; Amy Reasinger Allen; Sharon W Davis; Amy Gaier; Carlan Graves; Karen Julesberg; Lynne Nguyen; Rosemarie Perocchia; Jo Beth Speyer; Doug Wagner; Chris Thomsen; Mary Anne Bright
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2005

2.  Targeting or tailoring?

Authors:  Kristina L Schmid; Susan E Rivers; Amy E Latimer; Peter Salovey
Journal:  Mark Health Serv       Date:  2008

3.  Physical activity compliance: differences between overweight/obese and normal-weight adults.

Authors:  Jaimie N Davis; Valerie A Hodges; M Beth Gillham
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  Does weight status influence perceptions of physical activity barriers among African-American women?

Authors:  Jeanine M Genkinger; Megan L Jehn; Marcella Sapun; Iris Mabry; Deborah Rohm Young
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.847

5.  Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter?

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Jasmin A Tiro; Rachel W Vojvodic; Sharon Coan; Pamela M Diamond; Anthony Greisinger; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Race moderates the relationship between obesity and colorectal cancer screening in women.

Authors:  Lucia A Leone; Marci K Campbell; Jessie A Satia; J Michael Bowling; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Randa Sifri; Terry Hyslop; Michael Rosenthal; Sally W Vernon; James Cocroft; Thomas Wolf; Jocelyn Andrel; Richard Wender
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Obesity and screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in women: a review.

Authors:  Sarah S Cohen; Rachel T Palmieri; Sarah J Nyante; Daniel O Koralek; Sangmi Kim; Patrick Bradshaw; Andrew F Olshan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Lifestyle factors and colorectal cancer risk (2): a systematic review and meta-analysis of associations with leisure-time physical activity.

Authors:  D J Harriss; G Atkinson; A Batterham; K George; N Tim Cable; T Reilly; N Haboubi; A G Renehan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Deborah J del Junco; Jasmin A Tiro; Sharon P Coan; Catherine A Perz; Lori A Bastian; William Rakowski; Wen Chan; David R Lairson; Amy McQueen; Maria E Fernandez; Cynthia Warrick; Arada Halder; Carlo DiClemente
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  5 in total

1.  Facilitators and Hindrances of Implementing Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Among Vietnamese Americans.

Authors:  Mo-Kyung Sin; Mei-Po Yip; Amanda Kimura; Shin-Ping Tu
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  A mixed methods comparison of perceived benefits and barriers to exercise between obese and nonobese women.

Authors:  Lucia Andrea Leone; Dianne S Ward
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2013-05

3.  Optimizing Tailored Communications for Health Risk Assessment: A Randomized Factorial Experiment of the Effects of Expectancy Priming, Autonomy Support, and Exemplification.

Authors:  Tara L Queen; Barbara A Martin; Carmina G Valle; Kurt M Ribisl; Deborah K Mayer; Deborah F Tate
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Investigating psychological variables for technologies promoting physical activity.

Authors:  Patricia Rick; Milagrosa Sánchez-Martín; Aneesha Singh; Sergio Navas-León; Mercedes Borda-Mas; Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze; Ana Tajadura-Jiménez
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-07-29

Review 5.  Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging.

Authors:  Chloë Williamson; Graham Baker; Nanette Mutrie; Ailsa Niven; Paul Kelly
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.457

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.