Literature DB >> 10175963

In vitro performance testing of three small volume-holding chambers under conditions that correspond with use by infants and small children.

J P Mitchell1, M W Nagel.   

Abstract

The in vitro behavior of three types of small volume-holding chambers intended for use by infants and small children (child AeroChamber, Vent-170 and Space Chamber) has been compared with two pMDI-delivered aerosol formulations (salbutamol: 100 micrograms unit dose and beclomethasone di-propionate (BDP): 50 micrograms unit dose) widely prescribed for this age group of patients. All devices were evaluated using a pediatric breathing simulator that created respiratory conditions likely to be encountered with infants and small children. The filter that collected aerosol delivered from the holding chamber on test was located at approximately the position that the patient's lips would be in the mask, by means of an annular support plate glued into the mask itself. At the lowest tidal volume (50 ml), no salbutamol or BDP was delivered by either the Vent-170 or Space Chamber, whereas the unit doses from the child AeroChamber were 39.7 +/- 1.6 micrograms and 11.8 +/- 1.2 micrograms, respectively. The Vent-170 and Space Chamber delivered measurable doses of both drugs when the tidal volume was increased to 100 ml and again to 200 ml, however, the corresponding doses available from the AeroChamber were always significantly greater. These findings emphasize the importance of designing in vitro tests that mimic use by the patient group for which the device is intended. In vitro measurements made at constant high flow rates in excess of 20 l/min do not reveal these differences in performance that are clinically significant, and may lead the physician to prescribe a device that under certain conditions may not deliver any drug to infants or small children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10175963     DOI: 10.1089/jam.1997.10.341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Med        ISSN: 0894-2684


  8 in total

1.  Inhalation devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Antiasthmatic drug delivery in children.

Authors:  Elizabeth Biggart; Andrew Bush
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Incentive device improves spacer technique but not clinical outcome in preschool children with asthma.

Authors:  André Schultz; Peter D Sly; Guicheng Zhang; André Venter; Peter N Le Souëf; Sunalene G Devadason
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 1.954

4.  Deposition of albuterol aerosol generated by pneumatic nebulizer in the Sophia Anatomical Infant Nose-Throat (SAINT) model.

Authors:  Beth L Laube; Gail Sharpless; Charles Shermer; Omer Nasir; Vincent Sullivan; Kenneth Powell
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Developing ways to evaluate in the laboratory how inhalation devices will be used by patients and care-givers: the need for clinically appropriate testing.

Authors:  Jolyon P Mitchell; Jason A Suggett
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 6.  Use of inhaler devices in pediatric asthma.

Authors:  Fernando Maria De Benedictis; David Selvaggio
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

7.  Valved holding chamber drug delivery is dependent on breathing pattern and device design.

Authors:  Péter Csonka; Lauri Lehtimäki
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2019-02-04

Review 8.  Optimal administration of bronchodilators with valved holding chambers in preschool children: a review of literature.

Authors:  Péter Csonka; Terhi Tapiainen; Mika J Mäkelä; Lauri Lehtimäki
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.183

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.