| Literature DB >> 10174322 |
Abstract
The level of uncertainty with regard to the outcomes of pharmacoeconomic studies cannot be completely covered by the statistical methods routinely employed to handle uncertainty in clinical research. Sensitivity analysis is the most common methodology to deal with the extra uncertainty associated with pharmacoeconomics, and has also been incorporated in recent guidelines on healthcare evaluation. However, the execution of a sensitivity analysis and the interpretation of its results have not yet been standardised, which may lead to subjectivity and consequently weaken the value of economic evaluations. This article presents a method of dealing more systematically with uncertainty and eliminating potential bias in sensitivity analysis, with regard to the measurement of sensitivity and the comparison of the degree of sensitivity between variables. An assessment of the disadvantages of using slope as a measure of sensitivity leads to 2 types of sensitivity analyses (point-sensitivity and range-sensitivity), which are integrated into one method for the measurement of sensitivity.Mesh:
Year: 1997 PMID: 10174322 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199712050-00006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmacoeconomics ISSN: 1170-7690 Impact factor: 4.981