Literature DB >> 10146886

Guidelines for economic analysis of pharmaceutical products: a draft document for Ontario and Canada.

A S Detsky1.   

Abstract

In Canada, provincial formulary review committees consider the effectiveness, safety, and cost of products when they derive advice for each Minister of Health. This article offers a draft set of guidelines for pharmaceutical manufacturers making submissions which include economic information, moving beyond a simple presentation of the unit price of the pharmaceutical product (e.g. price per day or course of therapy) and comparison to similar prices for alternative products. A full economic analysis compares all relevant costs and clinical outcomes of the new product with alternate therapeutic strategies for treating patients with a particular condition. The perspective of the decision maker must be clearly identified. The quality of the evidence supporting estimates of the variables incorporated in the analysis should be evaluated. Sensitivity analyses are used to assess the robustness of the qualitative conclusions. Reviewers will examine the answers to a set of 19 questions. Manufacturers can use these questions as a worksheet for preparation of an economic analysis to be incorporated in a submission. These guidelines are intended to be a starting point for further refinement, and discussion with health economists in industry and academia. Considerable flexibility will be used in reviewing documentation supporting economic analysis. Those preparing submissions should be encouraged to experiment with various approaches as part of the general development of this field and to engage provincial review committees in ongoing discussions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10146886     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199303050-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  13 in total

1.  Principles of pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapy.

Authors:  D A Freund; R S Dittus
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Discounting in cost-effectiveness analysis of healthcare programmes.

Authors:  D A Katz; H G Welch
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Preference based outcome measures for economic evaluation of drug interventions: quality adjusted life years (QALYs) versus healthy years equivalents (HYEs).

Authors:  A Mehrez; A Gafni
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Economic analysis as an aid to subsidisation decisions: the development of Australian guidelines for pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  D Henry
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Cost effectiveness/utility analyses. Do current decision rules lead us to where we want to be?

Authors:  S Birch; A Gafni
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations.

Authors:  A Laupacis; D Feeny; A S Detsky; P X Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Clinical economics. A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A S Detsky; I G Naglie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  How to read clinical journals: VII. To understand an economic evaluation (part A).

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Should Canada and the United States universally vaccinate infants against hepatitis B? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  M Krahn; A S Detsky
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Pharmaceutical policies in Canada: another example of federal-provincial discord.

Authors:  A H Anis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Inclusion of drugs in provincial drug benefit programs: who is making these decisions, and are they the right ones?

Authors:  Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Managing public payment for high-cost, high-benefit treatment: enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease in Ontario.

Authors:  J T Clarke; D Amato; R B Deber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Using economic evaluations to make formulary coverage decisions. So much for guidelines.

Authors:  A H Anis; Y Gagnon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Economic evaluation of drugs and its potential uses in policy making.

Authors:  M Johannesson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Measuring sensitivity in pharmacoeconomic studies. An integration of point-sensitivity and range-sensitivity.

Authors:  M J Nuijten; M Hardens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Why training is the key to successful guideline implementation.

Authors:  A D Paltiel; P J Neumann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Ontario's formulary committee: how recommendations are made.

Authors:  Anne M PausJenssen; Peter A Singer; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Indirect costs in economic studies: confronting the confusion.

Authors:  M A Koopmanschap; F F Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Statistical versus quantitative significance in the socioeconomic evaluation of medicines.

Authors:  B J O'Brien; M F Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.