J Brug1, K Glanz, G Kok. 1. Department of Health Education and Promotion, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study examined whether eating practices and psychosocial factors differed across stages of change for fruit and vegetables. DESIGN: Data were collected using a self-administered written survey among a convenience sample of 739 Dutch adults. Response rate was 92%. SETTING: Data were collected as part of the baseline assessment for a nutrition intervention study. MEASURES: Fruit and vegetable intake was measured as self-reported consumption with a validated eight-item food frequency questionnaire. Psychosocial variables were measured with six items on bipolar seven-point scales and stage-of-change classifications were based on separate four-item algorithms for fruits and vegetables. Differences in psychosocial factors and consumption were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with Scheffé's multiple-comparison test. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between stages of change in dietary intake, attitudes, self-efficacy, and judgment of one's own intake compared to others. Attitudes were most positive in preparation and action and least positive in precontemplation. Intake and self-efficacy were more positive in action/maintenance than in pre-action stages. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that nutrition education aimed at encouraging higher intake of fruits and vegetables might be most effective if it is stage-tailored. Messages to influence attitudes about fruits and vegetables are likely to affect people in precontemplation, and self-efficacy information to increase confidence in overcoming barriers to consumption is likely to be effective with persons in contemplation and preparation stages.
PURPOSE: This study examined whether eating practices and psychosocial factors differed across stages of change for fruit and vegetables. DESIGN: Data were collected using a self-administered written survey among a convenience sample of 739 Dutch adults. Response rate was 92%. SETTING: Data were collected as part of the baseline assessment for a nutrition intervention study. MEASURES: Fruit and vegetable intake was measured as self-reported consumption with a validated eight-item food frequency questionnaire. Psychosocial variables were measured with six items on bipolar seven-point scales and stage-of-change classifications were based on separate four-item algorithms for fruits and vegetables. Differences in psychosocial factors and consumption were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with Scheffé's multiple-comparison test. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between stages of change in dietary intake, attitudes, self-efficacy, and judgment of one's own intake compared to others. Attitudes were most positive in preparation and action and least positive in precontemplation. Intake and self-efficacy were more positive in action/maintenance than in pre-action stages. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that nutrition education aimed at encouraging higher intake of fruits and vegetables might be most effective if it is stage-tailored. Messages to influence attitudes about fruits and vegetables are likely to affect people in precontemplation, and self-efficacy information to increase confidence in overcoming barriers to consumption is likely to be effective with persons in contemplation and preparation stages.
Authors: Randi L Wolf; Stephen J Lepore; Jonathan L Vandergrift; Lindsay Wetmore-Arkader; Elizabeth McGinty; Gabriel Pietrzak; Amy L Yaroch Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2008-08
Authors: Courtney R Lyles; Michael S Wolf; Dean Schillinger; Terry C Davis; Darren Dewalt; Allison R Dahlke; Laura Curtis; Hilary K Seligman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Andrea Werkman; Albertine J Schuit; Lydia Kwak; Stef P J Kremers; Tommy L S Visscher; Frans J Kok; Evert G Schouten Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2006-12-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ellen B M Elsman; Joanne N Leerlooijer; Josien Ter Beek; Geerke Duijzer; Sophia C Jansen; Gerrit J Hiddink; Edith J M Feskens; Annemien Haveman-Nies Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-10-27 Impact factor: 3.295